 |
|
 |
|
Next: PC shuts down immediately after POST
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: May 17, 2007 Posts: 65
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 7:33 am
Post subject: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>storage (more info?)
|
|
|
I'm torn between two choices, wondering if anyone knows the pros and
cons of each if any...
I prefer the 3ware brand, but i'm not opposed to Areca, as we've had
them before and they work well.
My main goal is to have dynamically expandable array ability without
recreating the array, which i know the 3ware does, but not sure on the
Areca.
Here are the two in question:
3ware 9650SE-12ML-KIT http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7229801
(full height); RAID10
areca arc-1230 http://www.directron.com/arc1230.html (low profile)
RAID1E
I noticed the areca only has RAID1E, but i guess this is just as good
if not more flexible than 10? This is key too as we will be using
RAID10.. Our case is also not full height or technically riser
capable, though we were planning on buying an 8x riser and using
standoffs to make the full height 3ware work in our 2u case (this
should be fine, but requires a little more effort).
Would we be just as well off going with the areca as the 3ware? Will
both perform just as well?
Also.. we have SAS ability and I know 3ware makes cables that would
work with our non multilane SAS backplane, not sure on the areca,
should we switch a few years later (from SATAII to SAS).
Thanks >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 07, 2003 Posts: 2174
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Previously markm75 <markm75c.RemoveThis@msn.com> wrote:
> I'm torn between two choices, wondering if anyone knows the pros and
> cons of each if any...
> I prefer the 3ware brand, but i'm not opposed to Areca, as we've had
> them before and they work well.
> My main goal is to have dynamically expandable array ability without
> recreating the array, which i know the 3ware does, but not sure on the
> Areca.
> Here are the two in question:
> 3ware 9650SE-12ML-KIT http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7229801
> (full height); RAID10
> areca arc-1230 http://www.directron.com/arc1230.html (low profile)
> RAID1E
> I noticed the areca only has RAID1E, but i guess this is just as good
> if not more flexible than 10? This is key too as we will be using
> RAID10.. Our case is also not full height or technically riser
> capable, though we were planning on buying an 8x riser and using
> standoffs to make the full height 3ware work in our 2u case (this
> should be fine, but requires a little more effort).
> Would we be just as well off going with the areca as the 3ware? Will
> both perform just as well?
> Also.. we have SAS ability and I know 3ware makes cables that would
> work with our non multilane SAS backplane, not sure on the areca,
> should we switch a few years later (from SATAII to SAS).
If it is Linux, 3ware is preferrable, since their driver is
in-kernel. The Arcea drivers work well also, but you have to patch
them in yourself. It also has no complete SMART support, which I think
is a big minus. 3ware has. As to dynamic extension, I am not sure
also. We have some Arcea 8 port controllers running, but that question
did not come up.
Arno >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 17, 2007 Posts: 65
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:45 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 14, 7:01 pm, Arno Wagner <m....RemoveThis@privacy.net> wrote:
> Previouslymarkm75<markm....RemoveThis@msn.com> wrote:
> > I'm torn between two choices, wondering if anyone knows the pros and
> > cons of each if any...
> > I prefer the 3ware brand, but i'm not opposed to Areca, as we've had
> > them before and they work well.
> > My main goal is to have dynamically expandable array ability without
> > recreating the array, which i know the 3ware does, but not sure on the
> > Areca.
> > Here are the two in question:
> > 3ware 9650SE-12ML-KIT http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7229801
> > (full height); RAID10
> > areca arc-1230http://www.directron.com/arc1230.html(low profile)
> > RAID1E
> > I noticed the areca only has RAID1E, but i guess this is just as good
> > if not more flexible than 10? This is key too as we will be using
> > RAID10.. Our case is also not full height or technically riser
> > capable, though we were planning on buying an 8x riser and using
> > standoffs to make the full height 3ware work in our 2u case (this
> > should be fine, but requires a little more effort).
> > Would we be just as well off going with the areca as the 3ware? Will
> > both perform just as well?
> > Also.. we have SAS ability and I know 3ware makes cables that would
> > work with our non multilane SAS backplane, not sure on the areca,
> > should we switch a few years later (from SATAII to SAS).
>
> If it is Linux, 3ware is preferrable, since their driver is
> in-kernel. The Arcea drivers work well also, but you have to patch
> them in yourself. It also has no complete SMART support, which I think
> is a big minus. 3ware has. As to dynamic extension, I am not sure
> also. We have some Arcea 8 port controllers running, but that question
> did not come up.
>
> Arno- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Its 2003 X64.. from looking at their website.. they appear to have all
the drivers (coming with the card).. No patching needed i guess?
Quite a few have said go with the aerca over 3ware.. then there were
actually a handful that said they had problems with areca, not to do
it, to stick with 3ware... >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 17, 2007 Posts: 65
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2007 8:50 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 14, 7:01 pm, Arno Wagner <m....DeleteThis@privacy.net> wrote:
> Previously markm75 <markm....DeleteThis@msn.com> wrote:
> > I'm torn between two choices, wondering if anyone knows the pros and
> > cons of each if any...
> > I prefer the3warebrand, but i'm not opposed to Areca, as we've had
> > them before and they work well.
> > My main goal is to have dynamically expandable array ability without
> > recreating the array, which i know the3waredoes, but not sure on the
> > Areca.
> > Here are the two in question:
> >3ware9650SE-12ML-KIT http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7229801
> > (full height); RAID10
> > areca arc-1230http://www.directron.com/arc1230.html(low profile)
> > RAID1E
> > I noticed the areca only has RAID1E, but i guess this is just as good
> > if not more flexible than 10? This is key too as we will be using
> > RAID10.. Our case is also not full height or technically riser
> > capable, though we were planning on buying an 8x riser and using
> > standoffs to make the full height3warework in our 2u case (this
> > should be fine, but requires a little more effort).
> > Would we be just as well off going with the areca as the3ware? Will
> > both perform just as well?
> > Also.. we have SAS ability and I know3waremakes cables that would
> > work with our non multilane SAS backplane, not sure on the areca,
> > should we switch a few years later (from SATAII to SAS).
>
> If it is Linux,3wareis preferrable, since their driver is
> in-kernel. The Arcea drivers work well also, but you have to patch
> them in yourself. It also has no complete SMART support, which I think
> is a big minus.3warehas. As to dynamic extension, I am not sure
> also. We have some Arcea 8 port controllers running, but that question
> did not come up.
>
> Arno- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
When you say no "complete" SMART.. what did you mean.. i mean the
description here appears to say it has it, but doesnt say the
specifics:
http://www.allpcdeals.com/servlet/the-10161/Areca-ARC1231ML-PCI-dsh-E-...A2/Deta >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 07, 2003 Posts: 2174
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:00 am
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Previously markm75 <markm75c.TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 7:01 pm, Arno Wagner <m....TakeThisOut@privacy.net> wrote:
>> Previouslymarkm75<markm....TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote:
>> > I'm torn between two choices, wondering if anyone knows the pros and
>> > cons of each if any...
>> > I prefer the 3ware brand, but i'm not opposed to Areca, as we've had
>> > them before and they work well.
>> > My main goal is to have dynamically expandable array ability without
>> > recreating the array, which i know the 3ware does, but not sure on the
>> > Areca.
>> > Here are the two in question:
>> > 3ware 9650SE-12ML-KIT http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7229801
>> > (full height); RAID10
>> > areca arc-1230http://www.directron.com/arc1230.html(low profile)
>> > RAID1E
>> > I noticed the areca only has RAID1E, but i guess this is just as good
>> > if not more flexible than 10? This is key too as we will be using
>> > RAID10.. Our case is also not full height or technically riser
>> > capable, though we were planning on buying an 8x riser and using
>> > standoffs to make the full height 3ware work in our 2u case (this
>> > should be fine, but requires a little more effort).
>> > Would we be just as well off going with the areca as the 3ware? Will
>> > both perform just as well?
>> > Also.. we have SAS ability and I know 3ware makes cables that would
>> > work with our non multilane SAS backplane, not sure on the areca,
>> > should we switch a few years later (from SATAII to SAS).
>>
>> If it is Linux, 3ware is preferrable, since their driver is
>> in-kernel. The Arcea drivers work well also, but you have to patch
>> them in yourself. It also has no complete SMART support, which I think
>> is a big minus. 3ware has. As to dynamic extension, I am not sure
>> also. We have some Arcea 8 port controllers running, but that question
>> did not come up.
>>
>> Arno- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> Its 2003 X64.. from looking at their website.. they appear to have all
> the drivers (coming with the card).. No patching needed i guess?
Microsoft uses external drivers, so this works differently.
Just install them. With Linux you do not need to install drivers.
Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages.
> Quite a few have said go with the aerca over 3ware.. then there were
> actually a handful that said they had problems with areca, not to do
> it, to stick with 3ware...
Difficult to say. You may have to try it and in the worst
case switch over to the other. Not ideal, but that is the
price to pay for PC hadware being pretty cheap.
Personally I would go with 3ware, but that is because of the
better Linux support. This may or may not indicate also a
better driver, since the Arcea driver is a source code driver,
but thay did not manage to get it into the kernel. That may
point to either technical or legal issues, I do not know.
The 3ware driver, however, needs to be pretty sound or it
would not have made it into the kernel.
Arno >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 07, 2003 Posts: 2174
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:00 am
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Previously markm75 <markm75c.TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 7:01 pm, Arno Wagner <m....TakeThisOut@privacy.net> wrote:
>> Previously markm75 <markm....TakeThisOut@msn.com> wrote:
>> > I'm torn between two choices, wondering if anyone knows the pros and
>> > cons of each if any...
>> > I prefer the3warebrand, but i'm not opposed to Areca, as we've had
>> > them before and they work well.
>> > My main goal is to have dynamically expandable array ability without
>> > recreating the array, which i know the3waredoes, but not sure on the
>> > Areca.
>> > Here are the two in question:
>> >3ware9650SE-12ML-KIT http://www.pcconnection.com/ProductDetail?Sku=7229801
>> > (full height); RAID10
>> > areca arc-1230http://www.directron.com/arc1230.html(low profile)
>> > RAID1E
>> > I noticed the areca only has RAID1E, but i guess this is just as good
>> > if not more flexible than 10? This is key too as we will be using
>> > RAID10.. Our case is also not full height or technically riser
>> > capable, though we were planning on buying an 8x riser and using
>> > standoffs to make the full height3warework in our 2u case (this
>> > should be fine, but requires a little more effort).
>> > Would we be just as well off going with the areca as the3ware? Will
>> > both perform just as well?
>> > Also.. we have SAS ability and I know3waremakes cables that would
>> > work with our non multilane SAS backplane, not sure on the areca,
>> > should we switch a few years later (from SATAII to SAS).
>>
>> If it is Linux,3wareis preferrable, since their driver is
>> in-kernel. The Arcea drivers work well also, but you have to patch
>> them in yourself. It also has no complete SMART support, which I think
>> is a big minus.3warehas. As to dynamic extension, I am not sure
>> also. We have some Arcea 8 port controllers running, but that question
>> did not come up.
>>
>> Arno- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
> When you say no "complete" SMART.. what did you mean.. i mean the
> description here appears to say it has it, but doesnt say the
> specifics:
> http://www.allpcdeals.com/servlet/the-10161/Areca-ARC1231ML-PCI-dsh-E-...A2/Deta
With 3ware, you can query the full smart attributes of each attached
disk. The Linux kernel has a special pass-through function for that.
The windows drivers may also have that. With Arcea you only get
the reallocated sector count (I think), the SMART status (failed/ok)
and the drive temperature. Some people (like me) want more.
Arno >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 16, 2007 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 6:00 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Arno Wagner wrote:
> ...
> With 3ware, you can query the full smart attributes of each attached
> disk. The Linux kernel has a special pass-through function for that.
> The windows drivers may also have that.
Yes, SMART support was added to the 3ware 9000 Windows driver in 2006.
See http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/#FAQ-RAID
Provides full SMART support, except SMART_WRITE_LOG.
Status, attributes, read logs and short/long/offline self-tests work.
Selective self-tests and SCT temperature history log do not work.
I talked to a product manager from Areca during CeBit 2007. There was
not much interest to add smart support (for external tools) to their
drivers.
Christian >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 07, 2003 Posts: 2174
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 1:54 am
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Previously Christian Franke <Christian.Franke RemoveThis @t-online.de> wrote:
> Arno Wagner wrote:
>> ...
>> With 3ware, you can query the full smart attributes of each attached
>> disk. The Linux kernel has a special pass-through function for that.
>> The windows drivers may also have that.
> Yes, SMART support was added to the 3ware 9000 Windows driver in 2006.
> See http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/#FAQ-RAID
> Provides full SMART support, except SMART_WRITE_LOG.
> Status, attributes, read logs and short/long/offline self-tests work.
Good. I think every server installation should run long SMART
selfteste on each disk every 14 days or so.
> Selective self-tests and SCT temperature history log do not work.
No loss. These are a bit obscure anyways.
> I talked to a product manager from Areca during CeBit 2007. There was
> not much interest to add smart support (for external tools) to their
> drivers.
Aha. That would be a good reason to go with 3ware.
Arno >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 17, 2007 Posts: 65
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:26 am
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 16, 8:54 pm, Arno Wagner <m... RemoveThis @privacy.net> wrote:
> Previously Christian Franke <Christian.Fra... RemoveThis @t-online.de> wrote:
>
> > Arno Wagner wrote:
> >> ...
> >> With 3ware, you can query the full smart attributes of each attached
> >> disk. The Linux kernel has a special pass-through function for that.
> >> The windows drivers may also have that.
> > Yes, SMART support was added to the 3ware 9000 Windows driver in 2006.
> > Seehttp://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/#FAQ-RAID
> > Provides full SMART support, except SMART_WRITE_LOG.
> > Status, attributes, read logs and short/long/offline self-tests work.
>
> Good. I think every server installation should run long SMART
> selfteste on each disk every 14 days or so.
>
> > Selective self-tests and SCT temperature history log do not work.
>
> No loss. These are a bit obscure anyways.
>
> > I talked to a product manager from Areca during CeBit 2007. There was
> > not much interest to add smart support (for external tools) to their
> > drivers.
>
> Aha. That would be a good reason to go with 3ware.
>
> Arno
In my searching i have found an article that actually gives lots of
Kudos to Aerca in terms of performance, mostly on what appears to be
for writes and for database/server applications:
http://tweakers.mobi/reviews/557
Their support is still very weak compared to 3ware though. >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 16, 2007 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Arno Wagner wrote:
> Previously Christian Franke <...> wrote:
> ...
>> Selective self-tests and SCT temperature history log do not work.
>
> No loss. These are a bit obscure anyways.
>
No loss for typical 24x7 server disk monitoring. But not so obscure
A long self-test of a large (400GB+) system disk may run several hours.
Selective self-tests are useful to test such disks on systems not
running 24x7.
The SCT temperature history feature provides a persistent log of (at
least) the last 2 hours. This info is useful in some situations.
Christian >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 07, 2003 Posts: 2174
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 7:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Previously Christian Franke <Christian.Franke.RemoveThis@t-online.de> wrote:
> Arno Wagner wrote:
>> Previously Christian Franke <...> wrote:
>> ...
>>> Selective self-tests and SCT temperature history log do not work.
>>
>> No loss. These are a bit obscure anyways.
>>
> No loss for typical 24x7 server disk monitoring. But not so obscure
> A long self-test of a large (400GB+) system disk may run several hours.
> Selective self-tests are useful to test such disks on systems not
> running 24x7.
Hmm. Ok. Although was this not arranged so that the disk
resumes a test after power outage at the place it was last?
> The SCT temperature history feature provides a persistent log of (at
> least) the last 2 hours. This info is useful in some situations.
I don't think a single of my disks supports that.
Arno >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 16, 2007 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Arno Wagner wrote:
> Previously Christian Franke <...> wrote:
> ...
>> A long self-test of a large (400GB+) system disk may run several hours.
>> Selective self-tests are useful to test such disks on systems not
>> running 24x7.
>
> Hmm. Ok. Although was this not arranged so that the disk
> resumes a test after power outage at the place it was last?
>
A boot cycle typically aborts the self test with status "Interrupted by
the host with hard or soft reset".
There is a method to specify that the self-test should be resumed. But
this is part of the selective self-test commands.
>> The SCT temperature history feature provides a persistent log of (at
>> least) the last 2 hours. This info is useful in some situations.
>
> I don't think a single of my disks supports that.
>
This is at least supported by some recent Maxtor, Samsung (e.g.
T133/166) and WD disks. hdparm -I reports this feature as "SCT Data
Tables (AC5)".
Christian >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 10, 2003 Posts: 1906
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 10:14 pm
Post subject: Re: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Arno Wagner wrote in news:5soblvF1abuv6U1@mid.individual.net
> Previously Christian Franke <Christian.Franke DeleteThis @t-online.de> wrote:
> > Arno Wagner wrote:
> > > Previously Christian Franke <...> wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > Selective self-tests and SCT temperature history log do not work.
> > >
> > > No loss. These are a bit obscure anyways.
> > >
>
> > No loss for typical 24x7 server disk monitoring. But not so obscure
>
> > A long self-test of a large (400GB+) system disk may run several hours.
> > Selective self-tests are useful to test such disks on systems not
> > running 24x7.
> Hmm. Ok. Although was this not arranged so that the disk
> resumes a test after power outage at the place it was last?
Which happens all the time on servers.
>
> > The SCT temperature history feature provides a persistent log of (at
> > least) the last 2 hours. This info is useful in some situations.
> I don't think
Indeed babblehead, you rarely do.
> a single of my disks supports that.
>
> Arno >> Stay informed about: 3ware or Areca for sataII multilane pci-e x8 controller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | pci-e x8 riser card for Areca ARC-1231ML? - Does anyone know what riser card would work with this card?: http://www.compuvest.us/ProductDetails.aspx?ProductID=219533 Would using a riser card diminish the performance? I'd need an "a side" card that was at least 1.5" high and no hi...
How to "Unlock" a drive from 3Ware 9500S array? - I apologize for multiposting this. I sent this to comp.arch.storage last night. I should have sent it to c.s.i.p.h.s instead I think. A SATA drive (Western Digital 2500SD) from a 3Ware 9500S array went offline and was replaced by a hot-spare. I..
Why HDTach shows RAID0 slower than JBOD on 3ware 3W-7450? - I connected 4 units Seagate ST340016A ATA100 to a 3W-7450 (firmware & Windows driver 7.7.0) and compared read & write speeds between RAID0 & JBOD with HDTach 2.7 on unformatted drives, but very puzzled to find RAID0 (4-drive striped 1024K wri...
4-port SATA RAID - 3ware 8506-4LP vs Adaptec 2410SA vs LSI.. - Greetings, I'm currently in the market for a 4-drive SATA controller. Anyone have any especially good or bad experiences or, even better, comparisons between the 3ware 8506-4LP, Adaptec 2410SA, or LSI MegaRAID 150-4? Benchmarks and other alternatives....
SATAII drive not detected - Hello all, I just purchased a WD1600JS SATA II Drive (160 GB) and a 1st generation SATA Host controller Card for the following system: P4 2.66 ghz Asus P4S8X-X motherboard 1 DVD-ROM 1 DVD Burner 1 Maxtor IDE 20 GB HD 1 MAxtor IDE 120 GB HD I installe... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|