|
Next: What video card should i keep?
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Feb 01, 2004 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 7:23 am
Post subject: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>videocards>nvidia (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 30, 2004 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 12:02 pm
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| Go for the FX5900 it is the better card..!
"Xeromus" <xeromus.RemoveThis@NOSPAMmusician.org> wrote in message
news:9pvo10lbdbii9bh6hg36eup8pi2fp9p05u@4ax.com...
> question is above, the price difference in negligible, which should I
> buy?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
|
>> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2004 Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 1:51 am
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:23:41 GMT, Xeromus <xeromus.RemoveThis@NOSPAMmusician.org> wrote:
>question is above, the price difference in negligible, which should I
>buy?
Go for a FX5900XT or SE
My Gigabyte FX5900XT is great..<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 31, 2004 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 1:51 am
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 02, 2004 Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 8:23 am
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
XT cards are piles.
Get the 5900...NOT XT!
--
Doug Whitesell
zigspalffy33 [at_symbol] verizon [dot] net
all your base are belong to us
"william bell" <wbell RemoveThis @whatnow.com> wrote in message
news:60jp10pu23krtc6etu2rdq8fdojrf7o7l0@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:23:41 GMT, Xeromus <xeromus RemoveThis @NOSPAMmusician.org>
wrote:
>
> >question is above, the price difference in negligible, which should I
> >buy?
>
>
>
> Go for a FX5900XT or SE
>
>
> My Gigabyte FX5900XT is great..
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2004 Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 5:12 pm
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 17:15:16 GMT, "maniac" <maniac.DeleteThis@SSKASSUJTOtweak.pl> wrote:
>william bell <wbell.DeleteThis@whatnow.com> wrote:
>
>> My Gigabyte FX5900XT is great..
>
>Clock speed after overclocking?
I don't overclock ..<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 01, 2004 Posts: 867
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 9:45 pm
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 05:23:40 GMT, "Doug Whitesell"
<hahah.RemoveThis@spambait.invalid.fuckspammers.org> wrote:
>XT cards are piles.
>
>Get the 5900...NOT XT!
>
Seek a genuine FX5900 at the right price. The FX5900 non-Ultra
is getting scarce, since the margins on Ultras and XTs are better.
The BFG ASLM5900/128 is on sale at Fry's for $199 thru
Tuesday (if they have not sold out....the ad appeared on Saturday.).
It may include the full version of Call of Duty.
John Lewis
>--
>Doug Whitesell
>zigspalffy33 [at_symbol] verizon [dot] net
>all your base are belong to us
>
>"william bell" <wbell.RemoveThis@whatnow.com> wrote in message
>news:60jp10pu23krtc6etu2rdq8fdojrf7o7l0@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:23:41 GMT, Xeromus <xeromus.RemoveThis@NOSPAMmusician.org>
>wrote:
>>
>> >question is above, the price difference in negligible, which should I
>> >buy?
>>
>>
>>
>> Go for a FX5900XT or SE
>>
>>
>> My Gigabyte FX5900XT is great..
>>
>>
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 28, 2004 Posts: 9
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 10:29 pm
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 18:45:51 GMT, john.dsl.DeleteThis@verizon.net (John Lewis)
wrote:
>On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 05:23:40 GMT, "Doug Whitesell"
><hahah.DeleteThis@spambait.invalid.fuckspammers.org> wrote:
>
>>XT cards are piles.
>>
>>Get the 5900...NOT XT!
>>
>
>Seek a genuine FX5900 at the right price. The FX5900 non-Ultra
>is getting scarce, since the margins on Ultras and XTs are better.
>The BFG ASLM5900/128 is on sale at Fry's for $199 thru
>Tuesday (if they have not sold out....the ad appeared on Saturday.).
>It may include the full version of Call of Duty.
>
>John Lewis
>
>
>>--
>>Doug Whitesell
>>zigspalffy33 [at_symbol] verizon [dot] net
>>all your base are belong to us
>>
>>"william bell" <wbell.DeleteThis@whatnow.com> wrote in message
>>news:60jp10pu23krtc6etu2rdq8fdojrf7o7l0@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:23:41 GMT, Xeromus <xeromus.DeleteThis@NOSPAMmusician.org>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>> >question is above, the price difference in negligible, which should I
>>> >buy?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Go for a FX5900XT or SE
>>>
>>>
>>> My Gigabyte FX5900XT is great..
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.buyxtremegear.com/bfg5900128.html" target="_blank">http://www.buyxtremegear.com/bfg5900128.html</a> in stock
Gotta go...,
Butterfield<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 18, 2004 Posts: 75
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2004 7:54 pm
Post subject: Re: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 04:23:41 GMT, Xeromus <xeromus DeleteThis @NOSPAMmusician.org>
wrote:
>question is above, the price difference in negligible, which should I
>buy?
i would say the fx5900 cause it as the nv36 technology and as a
256bits memory tech. + it as 8pixel per clock.
that about it but i can't say if it's good
any comment would be nice.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: is 5700 ultra or 5900 better? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |