5.5x100 or 5x112 and PC100 or PC133

My experience is different. While the system may be slightly less stable,
most peripherals shouldn't have a problem with a 112 MHz fsb. Plus you will
get a bigger performance boost than you would with just the 10% increase in
CPU core speed you get with 5.5x100 (assuming you are starting with a k6-2+
500). You will need good PC100 and you might have to bump up the CL to 3,
but if you have PC133 it will obviously run easily at 112. It is so easy to
change the fsb and multiplier settings and you won't hurt anything, so just
try both. In either case, try it at 2.0v first. If that doesn't work go up
a .1v. If that doesn't work you might try another .1v, but I don't think it
is worth it try any higher voltages. You might want to check this out:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://home.cfl.rr.com/pheenix/k63oc.htm" target="_blank">http://home.cfl.rr.com/pheenix/k63oc.htm</a>

"Kyle Brant" <me DeleteThis @privacy.net> wrote in message
news:bfrme1$2b4u9$1@ID-57815.news.uni-berlin.de...
 > Many systems simply do not like 112 MHz fsb, the chipset and/or other
 > PCI peripherals may not like the 11 % overclock. Best option is to
 > get 5.5x100 working, then the only overclock is the CPU. I've not had
 > any success with 112 MHz FSB.
 >
 > --
 > Best regards,
 > Kyle
 > tired of spam, no email address
 > "Keith Dawson" <kmdawson DeleteThis @mbnet.fi> wrote in message
 > news:3F214A02.CCF2A9A7@mbnet.fi...
 > | Hi,
 > | For a K6-2+, which is the more common successful combination? what
 > about
 > | voltage+
 > | What's the better option, if the FSB and/or the memory clock are
 > running
 > | at 112Mhz?
 > | TIA.
 > |
 > | Keith
 > | K6-2+(450@5x100/2.0V
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: 5.5x100 or 5x112 and PC100 or PC133