Welcome to HardwareForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ?

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Nvidia RSS
Related Topics:
9800GX2 30% faster than 8800 Ultra - From TH's: "We don't know yet if the GeForce 9800GX2, which is supposed to be 30% faster than the 8800 Ultra, will support Quad SLI The expected price: around $449 US. Expected date: February 14, Something isn't..

Unreal and 7900 GTX - Hi Does anyone else have any problems running the new unreal on a 7900 GTX card? I brought a new card about 3 months ago - its great in all my other games but on unreal I get the odd judder when in the middle of a When moving around the map..

Why does my 7900 GTO run Crysis so well? - Action is very smooth. Graphics is very clear and highly detailed. FPS is in the 30s during action scenes, and even higher when in quieter areas. I have 4 High settings .. rest Medium. Latest NVidia driver, and latest for WinXP. Also X2..

7900 gto overclock/ bios issue - I can overclock my card to 679/800 , Im now using 169.21, Nv driver and rivatuner 2.06 to I also attempted to set the fan to keep it cool. People who have flashed their bios to 7900 gtx are getting much higher there..

GTX 7900 Owners Bought Card at the right time. - GTX 8800 USELESS BECAUSE IT NEEDS LOL. LOL. LUCKY ME ! LUCKY YOU IF YOU GOT A GTX 7900 TOO ! :) Bye, Skybuck.
Next:  Nvidia: Different aspect ratios with quadro fx1500  
Author Message
johns

External


Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 52



(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 11:14 am
Post subject: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ?
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>videocards>nvidia (more info?)

My 7900 GTO has a core clock of 650 mhz. The typical 8800
at NewEgg is clocked around 576 mhz. My card right now, as
old as it is, still sells for over $200. The 8800 GTS is about
$250 at CompUSA website. That tells me the 8800 will go
under $200 after Christmas. Is there any reason to buy it
then ?

Also, I notice that the cards with very large memory ..
like over 700 megs ... are even slower. Is there an optimum
memory size on these new cards ? Is that on-card ram
used for anything other than display ? Are there on-card
calculations being done, or is it just for higher monitor
resolutions ?

And then there is the issue of whether a game is
cpu ( or dual cpu ) intensive .. or do the newer games
benefit from the faster cards ? If a game is mostly
pushing the cpu, and the card is merely driving the
display, don't we reach a point where card speed
is meaningless ? For example, my box is an X2
4600. If I put an 8800 super card in that box, would
it improve anything under WinXP ? It almost sounds
like the big deal is Dx10 in Vista ... and a Dx10
game card.

johns

 >> Stay informed about: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
johns

External


Since: Apr 20, 2007
Posts: 52



(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 1:46 pm
Post subject: Re: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I'm sure there is, but I remember clearly that
the 9800 Pro gave much deeper colors and
finer detail than almost any card since. I think
the only reason the faster cards became
acceptable is that LCD screens are somewhat
grainy anyway, so upping the speed and
outputting lower quality video can't be seen.
And then came the overclocking to up the
FPS needed by newer action games loaded
with on-screen characters and active environs.
More pipelines gave us that, but did it give
more than merely a faster display? I notice
that the 8800 owners are not seeing a great
improvement in Crysis over my 7900 GTO
.... other than Dx10 in Vista. Is this a ploy
to sell Vista to gamers ? And what are we
getting ?

johns

 >> Stay informed about: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Augustus

External


Since: Jan 21, 2006
Posts: 356



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 4:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"johns" <johns321.DeleteThis@moscow.com> wrote in message
news:b433261b-f00a-4dd6-9374-a61951542f3a@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> My 7900 GTO has a core clock of 650 mhz. The typical 8800
> at NewEgg is clocked around 576 mhz. My card right now, as
> old as it is, still sells for over $200. The 8800 GTS is about
> $250 at CompUSA website. That tells me the 8800 will go
> under $200 after Christmas. Is there any reason to buy it
> then ?

Well, I used to have a 9800 Pro that was clocked a lot lower GPU/Memory wise
that a 9600XT. But it' had double the pipelines and a 256bit memory bus,
while the 9600XT was 128bit. It had almost double the performance in games.
It's not about sheer Mhz, but numbers of pipelines, shaders and GPU
architecture as well as memory bus width. An 8800GTX GPU runs at
575Mhz....but there's way more to it than this.
 >> Stay informed about: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mr.E Solved!

External


Since: Dec 10, 2006
Posts: 354



(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:19 am
Post subject: Re: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

johns wrote:

> My 7900 GTO has a core clock of 650 mhz. The typical 8800
> at NewEgg is clocked around 576 mhz. My card right now, as
> old as it is, still sells for over $200. The 8800 GTS is about
> $250 at CompUSA website. That tells me the 8800 will go
> under $200 after Christmas. Is there any reason to buy it
> then ?

Only you can say if that card meets your needs and your budget.


> Also, I notice that the cards with very large memory ..
> like over 700 megs ... are even slower. Is there an optimum
> memory size on these new cards ?

No, and your premise is false! Cards with more video ram are not, as a
rule, slower than cards with less, all other things similar. There are
natural "powers of 2" points of convention.

> Is that on-card ram
> used for anything other than display ? Are there on-card
> calculations being done, or is it just for higher monitor
> resolutions ?

You can do anything you want with the GPU subsystem if you follow the
SDK, even if it won't be done well. There are many "off label" ideas for
GPUs in use now, google is your friend.

Nearly everything ends up in video ram somehow, all manners of results
of calculations, FSAA, texture filterings, the frame buffer, stencil
shadows, z-buffering, you name it. Surprisingly modest games can eat up
a large amount of video ram.


> And then there is the issue of whether a game is
> cpu ( or dual cpu ) intensive .. or do the newer games
> benefit from the faster cards ? If a game is mostly
> pushing the cpu, and the card is merely driving the
> display, don't we reach a point where card speed
> is meaningless ? For example, my box is an X2
> 4600. If I put an 8800 super card in that box, would
> it improve anything under WinXP ? It almost sounds
> like the big deal is Dx10 in Vista ... and a Dx10
> game card.
>
> johns

This is why we read review sites that benchmark games and answer these
broad topics specifically, since you can't predict game performance
until you actually bench it, no matter who says otherwise, even the
developers can only guess within certain "performance buckets" of how
any given machine class will respond.

Budem zdorovy!
 >> Stay informed about: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Lee Waun1

External


Since: Aug 08, 2003
Posts: 21



(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 2:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"johns" <johns321 DeleteThis @moscow.com> wrote in message
news:b433261b-f00a-4dd6-9374-a61951542f3a@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> And then there is the issue of whether a game is
> cpu ( or dual cpu ) intensive .. or do the newer games
> benefit from the faster cards ? If a game is mostly
> pushing the cpu, and the card is merely driving the
> display, don't we reach a point where card speed
> is meaningless ? For example, my box is an X2
> 4600. If I put an 8800 super card in that box, would
> it improve anything under WinXP ? It almost sounds
> like the big deal is Dx10 in Vista ... and a Dx10
> game card.
>
> johns

Well I had a ATI x1950 pro card in my machine and yesterday I put a XFX 8800
GT in this machine and the desktop is now much sharper and colours much
nicer on the desktop than it was with the ATI card. As for game performance
this 8800 leaves the ati card in the dust.
 >> Stay informed about: Why is my 7900 GTO clocked faster than the 8800 ? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Nvidia All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]