 |
|
|
|
Next: No wonder A64's just dropped in price!
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 07, 2004
Posts: 192
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:04 pm
Post subject: AMD Sempron ships
Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>chips, others (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Aug 04, 2004
Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 2:33 pm
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Why is this posted to the Intel
site... just curious.
"Yousuf Khan" <bbbl67 DeleteThis @ezrs.com> wrote in message
news:VKLNc.529$CQV.176@news04.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
> Looks like AMD has taken the wraps off of its budget Sempron line a few
days
> early.
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3387051</font" target="_blank">http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3387051</font</a>>
>
> There are two distinct lines of Semprons, several K7-based Socket A and a
> K8-based Socket 754. The K8 Semprons have their 64-bit capabilities
> disabled. The K7's range in performance from 2200+ to 2800+, while the K8
is
> at 3100+.
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://makeashorterlink.com/?M4CF229E8</font" target="_blank">http://makeashorterlink.com/?M4CF229E8</font</a>>
>
>
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp?liArticleID=132287&liArticleTypeID=1&liCategoryID=1&liChannelID=2&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage=1" target="_blank">http://www.computerweekly.com/articles/article.asp?liArticleID=132287&...rticleT</a>
>
> Here's the benches:
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2139</font" target="_blank">http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2139</font</a>>
>
> Yousuf Khan
>
> --
> Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com
> Spambots: just reply to this email address 
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 09, 2004
Posts: 488
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 1:34 am
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote:
> Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD?
Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter!
> Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious.
My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy
of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor
is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might
just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here).
....not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters
hang out.
In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon!
--
Keith<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 04, 2004
Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 1:48 am
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Keith" <krw.DeleteThis@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.07.30.02.34.39.752244@att.bizzzz...
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote:
>
> > Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD?
>
> Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter!
>
Rah, rah, rah... go stick a sempron up your ass.
> > Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious.
>
> My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy
> of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor
> is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might
> just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here).
>
> ...not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters
> hang out.
>
> In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon!
What's a "maroon"? Webster says: " a dark red " and "a descendant of such
a slave".
Well, I may be a "maroon", but you are clearly a retard.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 582
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 5:44 am
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:34:40 -0400, Keith <krw.TakeThisOut@att.bizzzz> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote:
>
>> Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD?
>
>Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter!
>
>> Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious.
>
>My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy
>of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor
>is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might
>just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here).
>
>...not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters
>hang out.
>
>In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon!
lmao! no prisoners taken here!
/daytripper (not that there's anything wrong with that <!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 09, 2004
Posts: 488
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 5:44 am
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 02:44:55 +0000, daytripper wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 22:34:40 -0400, Keith <krw.TakeThisOut@att.bizzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 11:33:59 -0600, Judd wrote:
>>
>>> Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD?
>>
>>Oh, good grief! Everyone with a brain is an AMD supporter!
>>
>>> Why is this posted to the Intel site... just curious.
>>
>>My my, somone has their panties in a twist! You don't consider AMD worthy
>>of talk in an Intel "Site" (I don't think CSI is supported by Intel, nor
>>is the Usenet a "site" of any reasonable description). OTOH, you might
>>just learn something from Mr. Khan (though I am stretching belief here).
>>
>>...not to mention this is also posted to CSIPHC where all us Intel haters
>>hang out.
>>
>>In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon!
>
> lmao! no prisoners taken here!
Uneducated combatants are supposed to be taken prisoner? Someone call
DonR!
>
> /daytripper (not that there's anything wrong with that
)
--
Keith<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 16, 2003
Posts: 137
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:49 pm
Post subject: Maroon: was Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Judd" <IhateSpam.TakeThisOut@stopspam.com> wrote in message
news:10gjkp78m5iah88@corp.supernews.com...
>
> > In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon!
>
> What's a "maroon"? Webster says: " a dark red " and "a descendant
of such
> a slave".
> Well, I may be a "maroon", but you are clearly a retard.
I'm addressing this to all 3 readers of comp.arch who aren't Bugs
Bunny cartoon fans. When Bugs wanted to denigrate the intelligence of
another cartoon character, he would **intend** to say "What a moron!"
but what actually came out (in the cartoon) would be "What a maroon!",
suggesting some ambiguity as to whose sagacity should be impugned. I
believe that this is the sense in which Keith was writing.
If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I
suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school. <!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 04, 2004
Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2004 9:49 pm
Post subject: Either way, there is a group called comp.hardware....amd.x86-64 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than
flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. It's to the point now where you
can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture
without the constant bashing. There should be a
comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff. >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 582
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:50 am
Post subject: Re: Maroon: was Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:49:45 GMT, "Felger Carbon" <fmsfnf DeleteThis @jfoops.net> wrote:
>"Judd" <IhateSpam DeleteThis @stopspam.com> wrote in message
>news:10gjkp78m5iah88@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> > In short, you're nothing but a top-posting maroon!
>>
>> What's a "maroon"? Webster says: " a dark red " and "a descendant
>of such
>> a slave".
>> Well, I may be a "maroon", but you are clearly a retard.
>
>I'm addressing this to all 3 readers of comp.arch who aren't Bugs
>Bunny cartoon fans. When Bugs wanted to denigrate the intelligence of
>another cartoon character, he would **intend** to say "What a moron!"
>but what actually came out (in the cartoon) would be "What a maroon!",
>suggesting some ambiguity as to whose sagacity should be impugned. I
>believe that this is the sense in which Keith was writing.
>
>If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I
>suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school.
Too cute by half.
My current fave:
"I don't know what your problem is, but I bet it's hard to spell"
<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 10, 2004
Posts: 318
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 10:55 am
Post subject: Re: Maroon: was Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 18:49:45 GMT, "Felger Carbon" <fmsfnf RemoveThis @jfoops.net>
wrote:
>If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I
>suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school.
But tha only works in perhaps only one culture/context no? At least
Bugs have got a bigger coverage :PppP
--
L.Angel: I'm looking for web design work.
If you need basic to med complexity webpages at affordable rates, email me 
Standard HTML, SHTML, MySQL + PHP or ASP, Javascript.
If you really want, FrontPage & DreamWeaver too.
But keep in mind you pay extra bandwidth for their bloated code<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 07, 2004
Posts: 192
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sun Aug 01, 2004 1:25 am
Post subject: Re: Maroon: was Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Felger Carbon wrote:
> If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I
> suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school.
In Canada, all that means is did you ever go to kindergarten? The short
buses were for the littlest kids that went for only half a day.
Yousuf Khan<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 12, 2003
Posts: 649
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Aug 03, 2004 1:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Maroon: was Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Felger Carbon" <fmsfnf.RemoveThis@jfoops.net> wrote:
>If you seriously want to challenge someone's intellectual dexterity, I
>suggest sweetly inquiring if they rode the short bus to school.
What an embezzle.
 <!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 19
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Fri Aug 06, 2004 12:32 am
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Judd wrote:
> Are you the unofficial spokesman for AMD? Why is this posted to the Intel
> site... just curious.
What Intel site was it posted to? I only see the newsgroups, which are
Intel and compatible in topic.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 10, 2004
Posts: 42
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Post subject: Re: Either way, there is a group called comp.hardware....amd.x86-64 [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Judd" <IhateSpam.TakeThisOut@stopspam.com> writes:
> The Intel haters and AMD lovers should post to that group rather than
> flooding comp.sys.intel with propoganda. It's to the point now where you
> can't talk nor get any information on Intel processors and architecture
> without the constant bashing. There should be a
> comp.religious.processor.wars or something more suitable for that stuff.
Would you be so kind to give me the exact name of that group, and
possibly a link to a newsfeed that carries it? I can't find any group
even close to that name at my newsfeed, nor in google's news archive.
Thanks,
Kai<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 28
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2004 6:49 am
Post subject: Re: AMD Sempron ships [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Yousuf Khan wrote:
> Looks like AMD has taken the wraps off of its budget Sempron line a few days
> early.
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3387051</font" target="_blank">http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3387051</font</a>>
>
> There are two distinct lines of Semprons, several K7-based Socket A and a
> K8-based Socket 754. The K8 Semprons have their 64-bit capabilities
> disabled. The K7's range in performance from 2200+ to 2800+, while the K8 is
> at 3100+.
Boy, could they sell a ton if they had a K7 with 64 bit enabled. Not for
performance, just to let people check out the functionality of the 64
bit software before getting all new hardware.
Probably couldn't get the 64 bit core to run in the Socket A, though,
even if they were willing to take the memory bandwidth hit.
--
bill davidsen (davidsen@darkstar.prodigy.com)
SBC/Prodigy Yorktown Heights NY data center
Project Leader, USENET news
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://newsgroups.news.prodigy.com" target="_blank">http://newsgroups.news.prodigy.com</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: AMD Sempron ships |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
