Bob Fry <bobfry.RemoveThis@mailinator.com> wrote:
>> The number of software and driver problems dwarfs a conceivable
>> single hard drive crash, in my world. And then there are non-hard
>> drive hardware problems that an easily accessible copy of the
>> Windows installation can help deal with.
>
> Windows OSs are so flakey that their problems far outnumber HDD
> failures or the like.
> JD, perhaps you could post a short description of how you use your
> hidden copy to repair Windows problems. I'm quite interested and
> probably others.
The main difference versus making an image of the whole drive is
where the copy is kept. With either method, there is a trade-off
between being up to date and having a known good copy (just like a
data backup), given the fact you can make only so many copies. So,
for troubleshooting purposes, copying just the Windows partition to
the same drive is fundamentally the same as imaging the whole disk
to another disk. Between the methods, the trade-off is the
difference between protection from catastrophic hard drive failure
versus the ease/quickness of restoring the Windows partition from
the same hard drive.
This really applies to either method.
During an installation of Windows XP, copies of the Windows
partition are kept in case something goes wrong, for example making
a copy immediately before a problematic hardware driver
installation. If the driver installation doesn't go smoothly, the
Windows partition is simply restored and you try again. The same
before Windows Updates and such. During ordinary everyday use, a
copy can be made regularly and just before doing anything
potentially problematic like removing/installing hardware. Restoring
the Windows partition is so easy when it's kept on the same drive,
you can just start the process and take a break (after copying out
the most recent data files, then the data is restored after Windows
is replaced with a good copy).
If a disk image is kept, Jan Alter's (and anyone in a similar
situation) could have more to do with trying to get the most recent
data backed up before doing a restoration of the disk image. The
only physical difference between the two methods is probably just
having enough hard drive space to keep a copy on the same drive.
Of course data has to be safeguarded and should always be kept on a
separate disk. And that could be a problem if you don't know where
data files are located. In Windows XP, most of them are in My
Documents.
I have no idea how to copy an OS partition on a Apple/Mac system.
Searching eBay, there is a Partition Commander, but zero results for
Partition Manager and searching for PartitionMagic produces up to
the old version 8 only. Not much for manipulating partitions. Maybe
Partition Commander is worth a look.
Thanks.
>> Stay informed about: Acronis for copying Windows partition?