|
Related Topics:
| Athlon 64 3500+ vs. Athlon 64 X2 3600+ - My dad is using my old CPU, which is a 3500+. He likes having numerous and other utilities running, despite my repeated warnings about them slowing the machine up. My question, is will the dual-core 3600+..
Athlon 3200+ - This is my Athlon 3200+ (actualy 2500+ - 11x200) 2x256 DDR 400Mhz RAM Ati 9200 128MB (AGP4x) I get only 6500 3dmarks 2001. What's wrong?!?
Athlon 64 3600 - how far can you push it before it gets unstable ? thanks d
Athlon 1800 ?'s - I got an athlon 1800 A. and i would like to know what is the max voltage i should give it. it's at 1.625 now and what is the max temp i should get it too, it's at 43 degrees. I'm running it on an Abit KX7-333R with the FSB at 175 and the..
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ or Dual AMD Athlon XP 2800+ - First of all, sorry for What would you suggest between Athlon 64 3200+ and Dual Athlon XP 2800+? I mean, which will be more usable in real life (Video games, and other I'll buy it next week so any..
|
|
|
Next: Air conditing OH MY god makes A HUGE difference.
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 1:06 am
Post subject: Athlon 2600+
Archived from groups: alt>comp>hardware>overclocking (more info?)
|
|
|
My Specs Are
Soyo KT400 MOBO
512 DDR333
Athlone XP 2600+
When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 3:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Default settiings YOU FOOL.
IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:06:52 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade.DeleteThis@nospam.com>
wrote:
>My Specs Are
>Soyo KT400 MOBO
>512 DDR333
>Athlone XP 2600+
>
>When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
>give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
>recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
>Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 24, 2003
Posts: 59
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 3:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:18:06 +1000, We Live For The One We Die For The
One <paul_mathews2002.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>Default settiings YOU FOOL.
>
>IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
>
wtf was that all about?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 3:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"GTD" <duh.TakeThisOut@stoopid.net> wrote in message =
news:aa05nvkdnd8eoftaj9vm10k52cbnkp31lk@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 12:18:06 +1000, We Live For The One We Die For The
> One <paul_mathews2002.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>=20
> >
> >Default settiings YOU FOOL.
> >
> >IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
> >
> wtf was that all about?
Really. this is a overclocker group.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 8:26 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
We Live For The One We Die For The One wrote:
> Default settiings YOU FOOL.
>
> IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:06:52 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade DeleteThis @nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>My Specs Are
>>Soyo KT400 MOBO
>>512 DDR333
>>Athlone XP 2600+
>>
>>When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
>>give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
>>recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
>>Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.
>
>
First, don't top post. Second, I guess that I do NOT want to run at
default settings since I wish to Oveclock, and this seems to be an
OVERCLOCK newsgroup. Hence the name alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
So whats your point ??
Is my Statement less vaild now ??
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:26:11 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade.DeleteThis@nospam.com>
wrote:
>We Live For The One We Die For The One wrote:
>> Default settiings YOU FOOL.
>>
>> IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:06:52 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade.DeleteThis@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>My Specs Are
>>>Soyo KT400 MOBO
>>>512 DDR333
>>>Athlone XP 2600+
>>>
>>>When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
>>>give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
>>>recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
>>>Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.
>>
>>
>First, don't top post. Second, I guess that I do NOT want to run at
>default settings since I wish to Oveclock, and this seems to be an
>OVERCLOCK newsgroup. Hence the name alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"We Live For The One We Die For The One" <paul_mathews2002 RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au> =
wrote in message news:q627nv8ke7v0acf41rt8vh9pkg0gt937k1@4ax.com...
>=20
> So whats your point ??
>=20
> Is my Statement less vaild now ??
You are less valid now.
>=20
>=20
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:26:11 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade RemoveThis @nospam.com>
> wrote:
>=20
> >We Live For The One We Die For The One wrote:
> >> Default settiings YOU FOOL.
> >>=20
> >> IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:06:52 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade RemoveThis @nospam.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >>>My Specs Are
> >>>Soyo KT400 MOBO
> >>>512 DDR333
> >>>Athlone XP 2600+
> >>>
> >>>When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer =
wont=20
> >>>give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. =
Any=20
> >>>recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,=20
> >>>Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.
> >>=20
> >>=20
> >First, don't top post. Second, I guess that I do NOT want to run at=20
> >default settings since I wish to Oveclock, and this seems to be an=20
> >OVERCLOCK newsgroup. Hence the name alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 11, 2004
Posts: 1478
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
We Live For The One We Die For The One wrote:
> So whats your point ??
>
> Is my Statement less vaild now ??
>
No. It's invalidity remains the same.
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:26:11 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade DeleteThis @nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>We Live For The One We Die For The One wrote:
>>
>>>Default settiings YOU FOOL.
>>>
>>>IS 2.0 GHTZ too slow for you ?
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 22:06:52 -0400, Renegade <renaxgade DeleteThis @nospam.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>My Specs Are
>>>>Soyo KT400 MOBO
>>>>512 DDR333
>>>>Athlone XP 2600+
>>>>
>>>>When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
>>>>give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
>>>>recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
>>>>Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>First, don't top post. Second, I guess that I do NOT want to run at
>>default settings since I wish to Oveclock, and this seems to be an
>>OVERCLOCK newsgroup. Hence the name alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Dec 12, 2003
Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:31 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"We Live For The One We Die For The One" <paul_mathews2002 DeleteThis @yahoo.com.au>
wrote in message news:q627nv8ke7v0acf41rt8vh9pkg0gt937k1@4ax.com...
>
> So whats your point ??
>
> Is my Statement less vaild now ??
>
>
Your statement doesn't and never did have any validity.
Neither version of the 2600+ (266 fsb or 333 fsb) runs at 2.0 gig at default
settings.
Who's a fool?
Hank<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 19, 2003
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2003 2:23 am
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Before u jump on your high horse i think u should read his post ;
"Any
>recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
>Multiplier, and anything else? "
I reckon u r the fucking fool ....
"Hank" <Hank RemoveThis @youbetya.com> wrote in message
news:bTOcb.6303$EF1.2924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "We Live For The One We Die For The One" <paul_mathews2002 RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au>
> wrote in message news:q627nv8ke7v0acf41rt8vh9pkg0gt937k1@4ax.com...
> >
> > So whats your point ??
> >
> > Is my Statement less vaild now ??
> >
> >
>
> Your statement doesn't and never did have any validity.
> Neither version of the 2600+ (266 fsb or 333 fsb) runs at 2.0 gig at
default
> settings.
> Who's a fool?
>
> Hank
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 12, 2003
Posts: 6
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2003 8:46 am
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Aussie" <NoWay.RemoveThis@upYours.com> wrote in message news:1064668786.207138@kangaroo.ozonline.com.au...
> Before u jump on your high horse i think u should read his post ;
>
> "Any
> >recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
> >Multiplier, and anything else? "
>
> I reckon u r the fucking fool ....
You should read the entire thread. First guy asked about the settings. Dickhead guy says Why bother? It runs at 2GB at default settings.Isn't that fast enough. This is a overclocker group. So Hank told him truthfully that he was wrong.
>
> "Hank" <Hank.RemoveThis@youbetya.com> wrote in message
> news:bTOcb.6303$EF1.2924@newssvr27.news.prodigy.com...
> >
> > "We Live For The One We Die For The One" <paul_mathews2002.RemoveThis@yahoo.com.au>
> > wrote in message news:q627nv8ke7v0acf41rt8vh9pkg0gt937k1@4ax.com...
> > >
> > > So whats your point ??
> > >
> > > Is my Statement less vaild now ??
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Your statement doesn't and never did have any validity.
> > Neither version of the 2600+ (266 fsb or 333 fsb) runs at 2.0 gig at
> default
> > settings.
> > Who's a fool?
> >
> > Hank
> >
> >
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2003 2:29 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The 2600,266 runs at 2.1.
The 2600, 333 runs at 2.0.
Give or take a few mhz.
Do you want me tell you the exact numbers 
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 04:02:15 GMT, "Hank" <Hank.TakeThisOut@youbetya.com> wrote:
>
>"We Live For The One We Die For The One" <paul_mathews2002.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au>
>wrote in message news:q627nv8ke7v0acf41rt8vh9pkg0gt937k1@4ax.com...
>>
>> So whats your point ??
>>
>> Is my Statement less vaild now ??
>>
>>
>
>Your statement doesn't and never did have any validity.
>Neither version of the 2600+ (266 fsb or 333 fsb) runs at 2.0 gig at default
>settings.
>Who's a fool?
>
>Hank
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 27, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2003 3:07 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Hi.
A few mhz.
I run 2468mhz on the 2600+, thats okay for me.
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.overclocking.dk/community.asp?mode=info&name=KillerFrog" target="_blank">http://www.overclocking.dk/community.asp?mode=info&name=KillerFrog</a>
"Renegade" <renaxgade.RemoveThis@nospam.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:ujKdndonpLkv0O-iU-KYvg@comcast.com...
> My Specs Are
> Soyo KT400 MOBO
> 512 DDR333
> Athlone XP 2600+
>
> When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
> give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
> recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
> Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2003 6:03 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
You are ???.
For even continuing this, NOT WORTH IT.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:29:08 +1000, We Live For The One We Die For The
One <paul_mathews2002 RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>
>The 2600,266 runs at 2.1.
>
>The 2600, 333 runs at 2.0.
>
>Give or take a few mhz.
>
>Do you want me tell you the exact numbers
>
>
>On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 04:02:15 GMT, "Hank" <Hank RemoveThis @youbetya.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"We Live For The One We Die For The One" <paul_mathews2002 RemoveThis @yahoo.com.au>
>>wrote in message news:q627nv8ke7v0acf41rt8vh9pkg0gt937k1@4ax.com...
>>>
>>> So whats your point ??
>>>
>>> Is my Statement less vaild now ??
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Your statement doesn't and never did have any validity.
>>Neither version of the 2600+ (266 fsb or 333 fsb) runs at 2.0 gig at default
>>settings.
>>Who's a fool?
>>
>>Hank
>><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 49
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2003 8:18 pm
Post subject: Re: Athlon 2600+ [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
You roast weenies on your pc don'y ya
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 12:07:29 +0200, "Jørn Petersen"
<jorn-petersen.TakeThisOut@mail.dk> wrote:
>Hi.
>
>A few mhz.
>
>I run 2468mhz on the 2600+, thats okay for me.
>
>http://www.overclocking.dk/community.asp?mode=info&name=KillerFrog
>
>
>"Renegade" <renaxgade.TakeThisOut@nospam.com> skrev i en meddelelse
>news:ujKdndonpLkv0O-iU-KYvg@comcast.com...
>> My Specs Are
>> Soyo KT400 MOBO
>> 512 DDR333
>> Athlone XP 2600+
>>
>> When I try to OC, most of the time I go a little high, the computer wont
>> give power to monitor, mouse and keyboard so I have to reset CMOS. Any
>> recommendations as to what i should set FSB, Voltage, Ram prefs,
>> Multiplier, and anything else? Thanks.
>>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Athlon 2600+ |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
