As far as Athlon 64 systems, is socket 939 the current sta..

 > 939 and 754. 939 has dual channel memory controller. 754 has single.
 > There's not much performance difference, but PCU's for the 754 are limted
 > to a max of 3700+ at present time and will probably stay that way.

Do you know how big's the difference between the dual-channel and the
single-channel platforms? Or have you seen any tests doing so? If yes, could
you be so gentle to point us to it/them?

Thanks in advance,

--
Pepe
Milano, Italy<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: As far as Athlon 64 systems, is socket 939 the current sta.. 

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:12:32 +0200, Giuseppe Carmine De Blasio wrote:

  >> 939 and 754. 939 has dual channel memory controller. 754 has single.
  >> There's not much performance difference, but PCU's for the 754 are limted
  >> to a max of 3700+ at present time and will probably stay that way.
 >
 > Do you know how big's the difference between the dual-channel and the
 > single-channel platforms? Or have you seen any tests doing so? If yes, could
 > you be so gentle to point us to it/them?
 >
At the same clockspeed, a dual channel system will perform about 1-3%
faster than single channel overall. You can find comparisons all over the
place.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2249&p=4" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2249&p=4</a>

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
My server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php" target="_blank">http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php</a>
Verizon server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm" target="_blank">http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: As far as Athlon 64 systems, is socket 939 the current sta.. 

Wes, what sort of core voltage are you running your Tbred B core @? Have you
tried upping the FSB at all or is that possible w/the motherboard you've
got?

--
Remove nospam to email
"Wes Newell" <w.newell DeleteThis @TAKEOUTverizon.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.04.11.17.15.19.775938@TAKEOUTverizon.net...
 > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 15:12:32 +0200, Giuseppe Carmine De Blasio wrote:
 >
   >>> 939 and 754. 939 has dual channel memory controller. 754 has single.
   >>> There's not much performance difference, but PCU's for the 754 are
   >>> limted
   >>> to a max of 3700+ at present time and will probably stay that way.
  >>
  >> Do you know how big's the difference between the dual-channel and the
  >> single-channel platforms? Or have you seen any tests doing so? If yes,
  >> could
  >> you be so gentle to point us to it/them?
  >>
 > At the same clockspeed, a dual channel system will perform about 1-3%
 > faster than single channel overall. You can find comparisons all over the
 > place.
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2249&p=4</font" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2249&p=4</font</a>>
 >
 > --
 > Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
<font color=purple> > My server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php</font" target="_blank">http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php</font</a>>
<font color=purple> > Verizon server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm</font" target="_blank">http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm</font</a>>
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: As far as Athlon 64 systems, is socket 939 the current sta.. 

On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:25:48 -0700, Doug wrote:

 > Wes, what sort of core voltage are you running your Tbred B core @? Have you
 > tried upping the FSB at all or is that possible w/the motherboard you've
 > got?

That cpu has made a lot of rounds. It was originally in a KT7-Raid board
and i had vcore to 1.85v for 2400MHz. After i gave the KT7 boards away, I
stuck the B core in an ASrock K7S8X-R3 board. It ran 2400MHz with only
1.80v in this board, and I tested the FSB up to 215MHz. Since this the cpu
went into my brothers old MSI K7T Pro board (also KT133 chipset). He ran
it at 1300MHz and 1.4v (the lowest setting in the bios). And now it's in a
PC Chips M811LU board I gave him running at default.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
My server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php" target="_blank">http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php</a>
Verizon server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm" target="_blank">http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: As far as Athlon 64 systems, is socket 939 the current sta..