R. C. White wrote:
> I'm not familiar with that mobo or with SATA, but your symptoms
> sound quite similar to those I experienced nearly 5 years ago when
> trying to install
It looks like all the 3 OS, I tried, make problems, but different
ones.
I would like to install Linux, but I tried XP and DOS too. Fdisk of
Win98 recognizes the S-ATA-drive with a simple DOS boot-floppy. XP
doesn't recognize the S-ATA drive. DOS recognizes the S-ATA HD
without any driver as _3rd_ drive, when 2 IDE-HDs are connected and
partitoning the 200MB HD was possible, when I tried 2% as primary
partition. Linux recognizes the S-ATA-HD as _1st_ drive, /dev/hda,
if no boot-parameter "ide=reverse" is used.
It looks like that the boot-information is searched at different
places, depending which hds are connected.
SuSE 9.1 uses grub as default and with grub different configurations
didn't work. Then I removed all harddisks and used the S-ATA HD
only (/dev/hda). It still didn't work, but when I converted the
grub-configuration to lilo without changing anything it worked!
Unfortunately I couldn't boot, when I added the IDE-drives again and
used the same lilo-conf. I tried a lot of other lilo-configurations
and always I get something like "no OS".
So, at least, I think it is a lilo-configuration problem.
Al<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Which Bios-Settings for S-ATA and Epox EP-8K9A9+