In article <t1n242lj548a071ovgl9sm76rjcqdt4lhm.RemoveThis@4ax.com>,
metroman.RemoveThis@urban.net wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 08:15:34 GMT, nospam.RemoveThis@needed.com (Paul) wrote:
>
> >In article <4jb042p2vqnrortfs93kfd7lh1jp2olacp.RemoveThis@4ax.com>,
> >metroman@urban.net wrote:
> >
> >> Several years ago I was ready to assemble my second computer.
> >> [Snip]
> >
> > [More snip]
> >... it will be a bit of work to get going.
> >
> >HTH,
> > Paul
>
> Paul
> Thank you for taking the time to carefully and thoroughly lay out your
> thoughts regarding this mess. (I found in my archive that you
> responded to my initial call for help at the beginning of this project
> in 2004.) I appreciate your input and all of the links. As you may
> guess, I had done some of this fact-finding regarding the
> incompatibility when the issue first arose. The more I read the more I
> think I can never have confidence in the P4C800. Last night I
> discovered a new caveat regarding the front USB connects. It seems a
> new mobo, Asus or other, is definitely needed. I can salvage the RAM
> (thank you for the tip about not adding a new pair now) and possibly
> the vid card although I'm ready to move away from Matrox after this.
>
> Want some slightly dated but unused parts, Paul? Too bad you're not
> near NYC, I'd happily barter some of your obvious expertise for my
> hardware.
>
> If nothing else, thanks for your support.
>
> I'm Paul too.
Despite the issues with USB and burnt Southbridges, I still
think 865/875 based boards are useful. And a 1.8Ghz processor
would be good enough for office work, email, web surfing
and the like. People with older S478 motherboards, would
be interested in your motherboard, so it doesn't belong in
the landfill. (You could even make a file server out of it,
by adding a $50 video card that can properly display the
BIOS setup. I have a couple FX5200's that I use for stuff
like that. By using a cheap PS/2 keyboard and mouse, there
is no need to go near the USB ports. I don't use mine.)
For Photoshop, I don't recollect my ever finding a site
that regularly updates their hardware recommendations, when
new processors come out. So while in principle, a dual core
from Intel or AMD would probably be a fast choice, it would
be comforting to know how much "value for money" each of the
potential choices can bring. The Macintosh forums used to be
a good source of contrasting reviews, but they were never
interested in testing all the possible AMD/Intel processor
variants.
On any case, I hope your next build goes a bit smoother.
Paul
>> Stay informed about: Component conflicts - second attempt at a second machine