But 960X720 is NOT 16:9, but 4X3 - so, I am convused - why not use
circuitry that respects the aspect ratio IMPLIED by the pixel count?
It would seem more difficult to streth 960X720 out to 16:9, and then
reduce it to fit the natural 4X3 aspect ratio of the CRT (such as the
Sony KV32HS510) than to just display the 720 lines with 960 pixels for
each line, maintaining the implied aspect ratio which matches the
natural aspect ratio of the CRT? Unless the CRT of these 4X3 HDTV's
(such as the SONY 32HS510) cannot truly display 720 lines. If these
sets cannot truly display 720 lines (non-interlaces), then the
advertised claim of being HDTV is false - no? In which case, is there
ANY model of ANY brand of 4X3 large screen HDTV out there that can
display TRUE 720 lines on non-interlaced signal? littleberry
>> Stay informed about: HDTV as PC Monitor