Paul P Mathews <paul_mathews2002.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com.au> wrote in
news:6btjgv845d5pllp0g4dpufs7o2uk5r2nn4@4ax.com:
> They don't.
On what basis do you make that assumption?
My facts:
1)when overclocked the Nature test begins artifact free, then visual
errors appear after a couple of seconds. Evidence implying heat build up
2)Turning off the fan pointed at the sinks produced visual errors. This
is with the case OFF so the rest of the computer is being cooled.
3) I could up my memory overclock by 10mhz without showing artifacts
Perhaps you're reading too much and taking other peoples asumptions as
fact.
BTW, I've reapplyed the thermal paste properly and can get 299/299
without artifacts, 15mhz more than without the ram sinks.
However beyond 300Mhz I get visual errors right when the test starts,
leading me to believe that heat is no longer the cause of the artifacts.
I do find it interesting however how we can interpret this for system
memory. Obviously they cannot tolerate any errors in which case the use
of ram sinks would only be useful in pushing the memory to their max and
in certain circumstances could lead to instability and unpredictability.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Installed Ramsinks on my 8500LE