Welcome to HardwareForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Intel compiler, was Intel x86-64 "near-identical"

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Chips RSS
Related Topics:
AMD, Intel x86-64 "near-identical" - MPR - This story has been reported in several places but here's the owner's summary of the full report, which is only available by that it's been reported, that they found

AMD or Intel - Thinking to get a new PC. What should I get ? AMD or Intel ? AMD is cheaper than Intel. I am worried about the heat generated by AMD. Is it still very hot ?

AMD XP OR INTEL P4 ??? - Hi, I am upgrading my PC, can you guys enlighten me on which processor to chose from. Should I go for AMD Athlon XP 2600 or Intel 2.8E HT??? Could you please suggest 1) 2) video card to go with your I am not a heavy gaming..

AMD or INTEL ? - AMD does come out with higher than intel. But i find many AMD systems not as expected against the intel and almost always its the intel that wins in every aspect. Why is the bench mark different from the..

Intel Or AMD? - Which processor is better? Im currently using a intel celeron (i know ) But am looking to the new 4's with Ive seen this amds that are quite good but i heard the semperons are bad. I vote Intel! -- Lexusan
Author Message
RusH1

External


Since: Feb 12, 2004
Posts: 58



(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Apr 08, 2004 2:56 am
Post subject: Intel compiler, was Intel x86-64 "near-identical"
Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>chips (more info?)

http://www.google.com/groups?threadm=a13e403a.0402091438.14018f5a@posti
ng.google.com

Quote :

"Once I ran the binary that was compiled with the Intel-specific flag
(-QxN) through iccOut, it was able to run on the FX51. Much to my
surprise, it ran fine and did not miscompare. On top of that, it got
the same 22% performance boost that I saw on the Pentium4 with an
actual Intel processor. This is very interesting to me, since it
appears that in fact no Intel-specific optimization has been done if
the AMD processor is also capable to taking advantage of these same
optimizations. If I'm missing something, I'd love for someone to point
it out for me. From the way it looks right now, it appears that Intel
is simply "cheating" to make their processors look better against
competitor's processors."

So who is stickong to Intel because of their superior compiler ? Wink

Pozdrawiam.
--
RusH //
http://pulse.pdi.net/~rush/qv30/
Like ninjas, true hackers are shrouded in secrecy and mystery.
You may never know -- UNTIL IT'S TOO LATE.

 >> Stay informed about: Intel compiler, was Intel x86-64 "near-identical" 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Chips All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]