"Johnny Canuck" <johnny.canuck.RemoveThis@mapleleaf.com> wrote in message
news:Xns95DDD65A0B4F6johnnycanuckmaplelea@64.59.144.76...
> "jpsga" <jpsga.RemoveThis@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:Q-udnZ50lKqn03rcRVn-vw@comcast.com:
>
>>
>> "Johnny Canuck" <johnny.canuck.RemoveThis@mapleleaf.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns95DDBC499C7A7johnnycanuckmaplelea@64.59.144.76...
>>>I just upgraded to this board and am stumped a bit by the temp
>>>reporting.
>>> My CPU is about 35C which is about right (standard PIB cooling, case
>>> has two intake and two exhaust 80mm fans as well as the PSU intake
>>> and exhaust (Enermax 465).
>>>
>>> Where I am stumped is that any monitor I use (SpeedFan, MBM, etc)
>>> reports the other temp reading at 105C. There's just no way that's
>>> remotely right ... but is there some formula to make it right? Or, is
>>> there some monitor that will more accurately read temps? Or, do I
>>> have to buy a fan control setup with display (Thermaltake, etc)?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>
>> I don't think the 35° C is right either. I wouldn't trust any of
>> freebee monitors on a new 64 bit board.
>>
>> The only reliable temp is thc CPU temp found in the BIOS.
>>
>> JPS
>>
>>
>>
>
> Thanks JPS ... the 35C is the BIOS temp, that's why I trust it. Any idea
> on the best way to pick up the other ones?
Took a look around the web and found that Gigabyte didn't leave you much to
work with to accomplish what you want to do. Since I did not see EasyTune5
as part of the sofeware package I wonder if the board has a chip called
ITE8705F. If it is there, MBM should be able to read the CPU temp. diode
and the chips own temp- AKA system temp.
JPS.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: KA-K8NS Ultra 939 Temps?