"K" <"kayjaybee"@clara.net> wrote in message
news:1060765122.91915.0@despina.uk.clara.net...
>
> "who be dat?" <forgetit.RemoveThis@dot.com> wrote in message
> news:vjj9ptra36pe0f@corp.supernews.com...
> >
> > "K" <"kayjaybee"@clara.net> wrote in message
> > news:1060732939.51323.0@lotis.uk.clara.net...
> > >
> > > "Radeon350" <Radeon350.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:ab1f5a92.0308121026.2bb44671@posting.google.com...
> > > > quote:
> > >
> > > Kyle Bennett is a complete fuckwit at the best of times. Given his
past
> > > record on his childish rants his opinions count for nothing.
> >
> > Translation: he slammed Nvidia so he doesn't know what he's talking
about,
> > once he praises Nvidia again he'll be a clear/logical thinker who
deserves
> > praise.
> >
> > Fanboys, gotta love 'em!
I guess someone's deductive reasoning input translation buffer circuit in
the ol' lunar module has a red-colored PCB here? With a maple-leaf stamp
somewhere?
> >
>
> No fanboy here, my next card is probably going to be a Radeon unless
Nvidia
> come out with something better. I totally agree with Kyle about 3Dmark03,
> it's a completely worthless benchmark but I realised this long before his
> tiny brain thought of it.
It's amazing that some people can interpret plain English as fanboi-ism by
adding all sorts of extraneous details. That would fall under the heading of
"knee-jerk anti-proselyte-esis"? Or perhaps prostatitis would be more to the
point?
> My point is that because of Mr Bennetts' past record of spewing forth
utter
> drivel, his opinions should be taken with a sack of salt.
Good point. There are lower critters on the evolutionary ladder however, the
Pabster being a good bad example. FWIW Kyle at least has enough integrity to
ADMIT he FU'ed...the Pabster OTOH will just try to bury it under MORE
sophomoric BS...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Kyle Bennett (HardOCP) blasts NVIDIA