Welcome to HardwareForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

L1 cache disabled OR NOT?

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Chips RSS
Next:  Linux, AMD64, and 3D console games  
Author Message
Colas

External


Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 1



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 2:33 pm
Post subject: L1 cache disabled OR NOT?
Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>chips (more info?)

I upgraded my old dell xps d 233Mhz with the powerleap 1.4 celeron
cpu. It's working great on bios A09 and windows 98se at 933Mhz.

One question then, at start up there is an two beep error message -
error system cache - cache disabled!

I just hit escape and it boots into windows fine.

of course I want L1 cache. I used powerleap cpu control panel and it
said:
L1 cache 32k
L2 cache 256k

sisoft sandra said:
L1 i cache 16k
L1 c cache 16k
L2 256

so did wcpuid
and intel processor frequency ID utility. None of these uses the
wording enabled disabled so I am unsure if they are actually telling
me that L1 is enabled.

I utility by Jan Steunebrink called chkcpu.exe says L1 enabled in
write-back mode. Doesn't mention L2 though.

I still get the error message and it's bugging me. How can I know for
sure?

Thanks
Colas

 >> Stay informed about: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Replicant

External


Since: Oct 06, 2003
Posts: 3



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 4:56 pm
Post subject: Re: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On 6 Oct 2003 11:33:13 -0700, francois.taylor.RemoveThis@wanadoo.fr (Colas)
wrote:

 >I upgraded my old dell xps d 233Mhz with the powerleap 1.4 celeron
 >cpu. It's working great on bios A09 and windows 98se at 933Mhz.
 >
 >One question then, at start up there is an two beep error message -
 >error system cache - cache disabled!
 >
 >I just hit escape and it boots into windows fine.
 >
 >of course I want L1 cache. I used powerleap cpu control panel and it
 >said:
 >L1 cache 32k
 >L2 cache 256k
 >
 >sisoft sandra said:
 >L1 i cache 16k
 >L1 c cache 16k
 >L2 256
 >
 >so did wcpuid
 >and intel processor frequency ID utility. None of these uses the
 >wording enabled disabled so I am unsure if they are actually telling
 >me that L1 is enabled.
 >
 >I utility by Jan Steunebrink called chkcpu.exe says L1 enabled in
 >write-back mode. Doesn't mention L2 though.
 >
 >I still get the error message and it's bugging me. How can I know for
 >sure?
 >
 >Thanks
 >Colas

Enter the mb bios and see if it's enabled or not.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Yousuf Khan1

External


Since: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: 214



(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:11 pm
Post subject: Re: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Colas" <francois.taylor.TakeThisOut@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
news:1ecaf211.0310061033.31ef04cd@posting.google.com...
 > I upgraded my old dell xps d 233Mhz with the powerleap 1.4 celeron
 > cpu. It's working great on bios A09 and windows 98se at 933Mhz.
 >
 > One question then, at start up there is an two beep error message -
 > error system cache - cache disabled!

Since your old system was a 233Mhz, then I would assume it was a Pentium
CPU. If so, then the L2 cache was built into the motherboard and not the
processor back then. The newer Celeron 1.4 has an L2 built into the
processor itself. So likely what has been disabled is the old L2 cache on
the motherboard. You don't need that old L2 cache because it's incompatible
with the Celeron.

If you don't want to see that error message anymore, then what you should do
is go into the motherboard's BIOS setup screen, and disable the L2 cache
directly in the BIOS. That way it won't even try to activate it.

Yousuf Khan<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Bob Knowlden

External


Since: Nov 15, 2003
Posts: 281



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2003 11:39 pm
Post subject: Re: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

The Dell Dimension XPS D___ PCs are PII machines, using the 440LX chipset.
(I doubt that it's practical to use a Celeron on any P5 mainboards; the
Powerleap adapter is just some sort of slocket, it doesn't replace the
chipset, AFAIK.) The 233 was the original "Klamath" CPU: 512 kB of
half-speed L2 cache, in the SECC (original Slot 1) cartridge.

Perhaps the compatibility of the Dell (from 1997) with a 1.4 GHz Celeron is
less than perfect. (In fact, a 1.4 GHz Celeron appears to need a 100 MHz bus
to run at its rated speed - on an LX board, it would give 14X66 MHz, or 933
MHz.) The only suggestion that I can offer the original poster is to make
sure that the BIOS is at the most recent version (which is A09 at
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://support.dell.com" target="_blank">http://support.dell.com</a>).

Good luck.

Bob Knowlden

Address may be altered to avoid spam. Replace nkbob with bobkn.

"Yousuf Khan" <removethisspam.bjsk90.removethispam.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:PABgb.249739$Lnr1.11424@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
 > "Colas" <francois.taylor.TakeThisOut@wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
 > news:1ecaf211.0310061033.31ef04cd@posting.google.com...
  > > I upgraded my old dell xps d 233Mhz with the powerleap 1.4 celeron
  > > cpu. It's working great on bios A09 and windows 98se at 933Mhz.
  > >
  > > One question then, at start up there is an two beep error message -
  > > error system cache - cache disabled!
 >
 > Since your old system was a 233Mhz, then I would assume it was a Pentium
 > CPU. If so, then the L2 cache was built into the motherboard and not the
 > processor back then. The newer Celeron 1.4 has an L2 built into the
 > processor itself. So likely what has been disabled is the old L2 cache on
 > the motherboard. You don't need that old L2 cache because it's
incompatible
 > with the Celeron.
 >
 > If you don't want to see that error message anymore, then what you should
do
 > is go into the motherboard's BIOS setup screen, and disable the L2 cache
 > directly in the BIOS. That way it won't even try to activate it.
 >
 > Yousuf Khan
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? 
Back to top
Login to vote
CLF

External


Since: Oct 09, 2003
Posts: 7



(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2003 2:14 am
Post subject: Re: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Yousuf Khan" <removethisspam.bjsk90.removethispam RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:PABgb.249739$Lnr1.11424@news01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com...
 > "Colas" <francois.taylor RemoveThis @wanadoo.fr> wrote in message
 > news:1ecaf211.0310061033.31ef04cd@posting.google.com...
  > > I upgraded my old dell xps d 233Mhz with the powerleap 1.4 celeron
  > > cpu. It's working great on bios A09 and windows 98se at 933Mhz.
  > >
  > > One question then, at start up there is an two beep error message -
  > > error system cache - cache disabled!
 >
 > Since your old system was a 233Mhz, then I would assume it was a Pentium
 > CPU. If so, then the L2 cache was built into the motherboard and not the
 > processor back then. The newer Celeron 1.4 has an L2 built into the
 > processor itself. So likely what has been disabled is the old L2 cache on
 > the motherboard. You don't need that old L2 cache because it's
incompatible
 > with the Celeron.
 >
 > If you don't want to see that error message anymore, then what you should
do
 > is go into the motherboard's BIOS setup screen, and disable the L2 cache
 > directly in the BIOS. That way it won't even try to activate it.
 >
 > Yousuf Khan

No offense Yousuf, but LOL!!!

The 233 Intels were mostly Slot 1s, to which you are not referring. What
you are referring to (where the L2 is on motherboard) is Socket 7, thus the
older Pentium (MMX, Pentium 1).

And the new Celeron is a Socket 370.

I know that the two are so incompatible, you can't even try to adapt them.
The Socket 370 is Intel-Only, the Socket 7 is pretty universal, Intel / AMD
/ Cyrix all had Socket 7s.

The error was inspecific, not referring to either L1 or L2, just simply
'cache.' So, to assume it is L2 is wrong, as is to assume it is L1.
However, it still makes sense to enter the BIOS and check to make sure both
are enabled, and disable them to test something. If they are disabled, and
the error goes away, but Windows is still just as speedy & all the programs
report back L1 is enabled, and L2 is enabled, then everythign is fine.

The question really lies on whether or not the motherboard's setting of L1
enable/disable, and L2 enable/disable controls the Powerleap adapter, or if
the Powerleap overrides the motherboard and always has it enabled, which I
lean more towards for the simple fact that the BIOS is reporting on boot
that it is disabling cache, but the programs report it is enabled (WCPUID
for example will show a grey box if there is no cache or if it is disabled,
so to report any cache means it is enabled).

At the very least you have an annoying message....

Out of curiosity, I notice that you bought the 1.4GHz (14x100), but have it
stuck with a 66MHz bus (14x66.66 = 933). Is this because the board is
incapable of supporting 100MHz bus? I have an old 440LX that cant support
100, but I have an old 440BX that I had upgraded to an 850 P3 CuMine
(8.5x100) fine, using the Powerleap adapter.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: L1 cache disabled OR NOT? 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
WANTED: Embedded software developers - Wanted software developers with 3+ years experience in developing embedded systems using C++, vxWorks, and Object oriented eesign and development. Please email full resumes and contact info to kayd@4cs.com

Is T-Bred B faster and cooler than T-Bred A? - This page http://www.motherboardfaqs.com/article.php?17.255 says: "The Thoroughbred "B" is simply a revised version of the A core, with one major kick - speed! These chips feature the usual optimizations on an instruction level...

Help me ID this ATI graphics card - I have this old graphics card which I am trying to identify. It is labelled Sept 1999. The circuit board has a logo on the circuit side which says "graphics by ATI Rage 128" On the components side of the circuit board it says "&quot...

Is Pseudo-Sync the same as "asynchronous mode"? - I believe that pseudo-sync is synchronized thus not asynchronized. However, is pseudo-sync also called 'asynchronous mode'? i've put some evidence that it is called 'asynchronous mode' at the end of the post in 2 chunks each marked..

Gluing together two broadband connections - Review of a product called the Edimax BR6524 Dual WAN Router: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13103
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Chips All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]