Welcome to HardwareForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

Linksys Router

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> PC Networking RSS
Next:  windows thin client.  
Author Message
Alex10

External


Since: Oct 05, 2003
Posts: 1



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 1:15 am
Post subject: Linksys Router
Archived from groups: comp>sys>ibm>pc>hardware>networking (more info?)

I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had some
ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
would be the best. Does it matter?

Thanks

--

 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
daytripper

External


Since: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 582



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:47 am
Post subject: Re: Linksys Router [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 22:15:42 -0400, "Alex" <alexkerr12.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote:

 >I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had some
 >ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
 >CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
 >not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
 >would be the best. Does it matter?

The uplink port is no big deal: they took one of the lan ports and attached it
to the cross-wired uplink port, to spare the user the aggro of buying
cross-over cables in addition to straight drops. If the uplink port was used,
the lan port it was grafted onto could not be used.

ie: no big deal either way

As for version 2 vs version 3, well, I *know* version 2 works Wink and it's
possible v3 is only out there to show off the new owner's logo...

/daytripper<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
Fabian Fuller

External


Since: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: 1



(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 5:38 pm
Post subject: Re: Linksys Router [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

I seem to recall that the newer version can automatically detect whether a
connection is an uplink or not, so they no longer need the extra uplink
port.

"Alex" <alexkerr12.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
news:vo1jmsh9hcet49@corp.supernews.com...
 > I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had
some
 > ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
 > CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
 > not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
 > would be the best. Does it matter?
 >
 > Thanks
 >
 > --
 >
 >
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
Hawk3

External


Since: Jan 20, 2004
Posts: 13



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:06 pm
Post subject: Re: Linksys Router [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Alex" <alexkerr12 RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:vo1jmsh9hcet49@corp.supernews.com...
 > I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had
some
 > ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
 > CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
 > not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
 > would be the best. Does it matter?
 >

It's always hard to know what to buy when a company does this. There are
generally two reasons for releasing a new rev.... a) cost reduced design or
b) functional enhancement. We all desire improved operation. It's not so
good if it's simply for cost reduction because you are either getting
cheaper components, less functionality, or both.

(*><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
daytripper

External


Since: Nov 18, 2003
Posts: 582



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 9:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Linksys Router [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:06:26 -0600, "Hawk" <jedi001.DeleteThis@netscape.net> wrote:

 >
 >"Alex" <alexkerr12.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in message
 >news:vo1jmsh9hcet49@corp.supernews.com...
  >> I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had
 >some
  >> ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
  >> CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
  >> not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
  >> would be the best. Does it matter?
  >>
 >
 >It's always hard to know what to buy when a company does this. There are
 >generally two reasons for releasing a new rev.... a) cost reduced design or
 >b) functional enhancement. We all desire improved operation. It's not so
 >good if it's simply for cost reduction because you are either getting
 >cheaper components, less functionality, or both.

In this case, it's most likely much simple: Cisco bought Linksys (fact) and
wanted the product rebadged (reasonable speculation)...

/daytripper (sometimes a cigar is just a cigar)<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
CJT

External


Since: Nov 10, 2003
Posts: 485



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 2:09 am
Post subject: Re: Linksys Router [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

daytripper wrote:
 > On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:06:26 -0600, "Hawk" <jedi001.DeleteThis@netscape.net> wrote:
 >
 >
  >>"Alex" <alexkerr12.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in message
  >>news:vo1jmsh9hcet49@corp.supernews.com...
  >>
   >>>I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had
  >>
  >>some
  >>
   >>>ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
   >>>CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
   >>>not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
   >>>would be the best. Does it matter?
   >>>
  >>
  >>It's always hard to know what to buy when a company does this. There are
  >>generally two reasons for releasing a new rev.... a) cost reduced design or
  >>b) functional enhancement. We all desire improved operation. It's not so
  >>good if it's simply for cost reduction because you are either getting
  >>cheaper components, less functionality, or both.
 >
 >
 > In this case, it's most likely much simple: Cisco bought Linksys (fact) and
 > wanted the product rebadged (reasonable speculation)...
 >
 > /daytripper (sometimes a cigar is just a cigar)

I think I read somewhere that the version 3 also has autosensing ports
(so the uplink port isn't needed any longer -- any port can act as an
uplink without the need for a crossover cable).<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
user62

External


Since: Jan 21, 2004
Posts: 3



(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 1:13 am
Post subject: Best wireless network router and PCI card for Win 98SE. [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Also, I want the fastest standard which is IIRC 54 super G? I am
running a Linksys right now and it is failing. Linksys doesn't even
have drivers on their web site for my PCI WMP54G version 1.1
networking card. I find that to be very fraustrating especially since
they said they emailed them to me two days ago. Then take into
consideration you are put on hold for 40 minutes to get to tech
support. I say Linksys still sucks.

Mike

Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:09:20 GMT, CJT <abujlehc DeleteThis @prodigy.net> wrote:

 >daytripper wrote:
  >> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 09:06:26 -0600, "Hawk" <jedi001 DeleteThis @netscape.net> wrote:
  >>
  >>
   >>>"Alex" <alexkerr12 DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
   >>>news:vo1jmsh9hcet49@corp.supernews.com...
   >>>
   >>>>I went into Best Buy to purchase a Linksys Router BEFSR41 and they had
   >>>
   >>>some
   >>>
   >>>>ver. 2 and ver. 3's. The only difference I could see was that ver. 3 said
   >>>>CISCO on it and had fewer lights. Upon further comparison, the Ver. 3 does
   >>>>not have the uplink port. Can anyone recommend which of the two versions
   >>>>would be the best. Does it matter?
   >>>>
   >>>
   >>>It's always hard to know what to buy when a company does this. There are
   >>>generally two reasons for releasing a new rev.... a) cost reduced design or
   >>>b) functional enhancement. We all desire improved operation. It's not so
   >>>good if it's simply for cost reduction because you are either getting
   >>>cheaper components, less functionality, or both.
  >>
  >>
  >> In this case, it's most likely much simple: Cisco bought Linksys (fact) and
  >> wanted the product rebadged (reasonable speculation)...
  >>
  >> /daytripper (sometimes a cigar is just a cigar)
 >
 >I think I read somewhere that the version 3 also has autosensing ports
 >(so the uplink port isn't needed any longer -- any port can act as an
 >uplink without the need for a crossover cable).<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: Linksys Router 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> PC Networking All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]