kony <spam.DeleteThis@spam.com> wrote in message news:<6fiuk0tm701tba2fj0o1av7t42hg826f2u.DeleteThis@4ax.com>...
> On 20 Sep 2004 13:47:24 -0700, q_q_anonymous.DeleteThis@yahoo.co.uk
> (Anon) wrote:
>
>
> >> Why don't you cross-post to a few more groups, you idiot?
> >
> >All those newsgroups were relevant. If I'd have wanted a bunch of
> >arrogant bastards replying to my post then I would have posted to a
> >newsgroup for arrogant bastards, such as comp.os.linux.advocacy a
> >newsgroup which you love so much.
> >
>
> Yeah, but it's not really appropriate to post to ALL
> "potentially" relevant newsgroups either, since there is a
> lot of overlap that would result in many, many groups
> getting swamped with posts. Try one or two MOST APPROPRIATE
> groups.
>
> Now onto the main issue, why do you post this?
> Is there a specific problem or do you expect the entire
> world to stop what they're doing and educate you instead of
> bothering to use a search engine?
I did use a search engine - the great google, and the results that
seemed most appropriate were those of toms hardware. Which were very
unhelpful. Did you know some people are actually happy to have
information archived to help many others?
If it were just for education, it would not just be for my education,
but for the rest of the world since google archives everything. Plus,
since it archives everything and there was nothing explaining the term
'asynchronous mode', on usenet or the web, that I could find, I feel
that WE are all doing a great service to the world, moreso those gerat
people like keith frank george and dave M and dave W that respond with
answers or questions or debate on the topic (not you kony of course).
Infact, if you look at archives and study my post. You will see that I
spent a lot of time going through earlier posts which included reading
posts from people that performed the same crime as me, posting a
question on usenet. Those questions and the responses were extremely
helpful and benefit people till the end of time. Infact some of the
posters that posted a similar question in earlier years did not
research previous answers as much as I did. Their crime was and is
helping future posters. And my crime is theirs.
I even referenced those posts in my first post. Since I am not asking
the question just to serve my own purposes, but to help others that
are interested in years to come. Infact, I even summarised the
opinions of keith and frank from a long previous thread. I have made a
great effort to be extremely helpful to people who want to know what
the term means. I invested a lot of time researching previous posts,
referencing them, summarising the opinions of authors writing in other
long threads that were hard to follow since the authors assigned
different meaning to their terminology and realised/cleared it up at
the end. And this thread actually answers that 'asynchronous mode'
question completely, and shows that Toms Hardware was extremely
unclear and misleading in its implications.
It is YOU that has not done his research. Had you bothered to read my
original post, you would have seen that I had done a lot of research
and made great efforts (as mentioned above) so that my post would help
others in the future.
How could I have researched for writing my post, summarised opinions
from previous posts, without a search engine? Without making thorough
use of a search engine?
How can you be so stupid as to think I didn't bother to use a search
engine???
How does my crime compare with the crime of earlier posters that
posted questions about pseudo-sync which were very helpful to me and
others?
Why do you think I summarised the research that I had done from
previous threads, even though that research contained no questions?
That's a hard question for you to answer, since you don't read posts,
but the answer is written in this post. I'll give you a hint
hint: that huge chunk of my post is archived to help others.
I wonder why you don't always notice when soembody is helping others
or using search engines. Even when it's blatantly obvious. Perhaps
it's because these qualities are alien to you.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Is Pseudo-Sync the same as "asynchronous mode"? 
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->