Very few sites test Quadro cards with games. (The defunct 3DPulpit is the
only one to come to mind.) When nVidia sends out a card for press use, the
company expects the benchmarks used to be relevant to the card's target
customer base.
But no, you won't see any substantial differences between Quadro and
Geforce, as they essentially share the same processor design. There might be
small differences due to different clock speeds. The Quadro also has better
sub-pixel precision, so FSAA quality might be a slight bit better, but
nothing worth the crazy price premium the Quadro commands (for gamers, that
is).
--
First of One
Formula SAE Racing:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://fsae.utoronto.ca/" target="_blank">http://fsae.utoronto.ca/</a>
"H. Jörg" <lemoncore.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c4sv09$2mkqu9$1@ID-190320.news.uni-berlin.de...
> Hi,
>
> I need some informations about the quadroFX series and games.
>
> Are the quadroFX series better (faster) than the 'default' nvidia series
> (because they're more for professional use (cad, ...))?
>
> Is there a good website for quadroFX benchmarks with games and other
> graphicboards?
>
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: nVidia QuadroFX for games?