Michael Culley wrote:
> "kony" <spam.TakeThisOut@spam.com> wrote in message news:epbdh0puvu95g3e81apojdk49qf8iddftl@4ax.com...
>
>>A P4 1.9 GHz would be a significant bottleneck with the new card,
>>yet the new card is the biggest single-point upgrade that would
>>improve performance.
>
>
> It's getting pretty silly when a 1.9ghz processor is considered a bottleneck. My first PC was 1mhz
>
> --
> Michael Culley
>
>
I built a Heathkit H89, that ran at 1.77 mhz, with 16kb of RAM, that I
piggy-backed three others onto, for 64KB, Whooeee! Whippeeee! It was
FAST! Games were in ASCII!
Fastest machine in my 28 units here now, is an AMD 2000+ (1.666mhz!),
while the slowest is a Packard Bell SX300, 386-20 (20 mhz!)!
25 of my machines are running GNU/Linux! Fastest, most secure in
comparison with MS prods.
I keep three systems on MS to do test comparisons... (they usually fail,
miserably!), and, the MS required updates, spyware, adware, AV, and
patches are definitely NOT worth the expense!!
Latest card in my setup is the ATI Radeon 9600-128Mb.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Radeon 9800 pro 128 - AGP slot question + Doom 3