|
Related Topics:
| Wi98-SATA - Hallo, I've two equal machines with and or 2.6. On the P IV 2.4 is running XP, on 2.6 Windows 98SE, both with Raid 1 Who can tell me, why the P2.4 is working faster in than the 2.6..
SATA Question - Hi All, I have an Asus A7N8X - Deluxe M/B with a Seagate SATA 120GB H/D set up on SATA 1. A CD-RW setup on IDE 1 as master and a CD-Rom set up as master on IDE 2. seems to be working O.K. but when I go into BIOS in shows the CD-RW as primary..
SATA & PATA - Board is a p4p800dlx running a P4 2.8ht, 1 gig of corsair pc3700. My 2 WD 80gig PATA are runnning as master 1 & 2 ( none raid) on the via My 160gig WD SATA is set up as the only master on the SATA primary IDE is empty &
A7N8X and SATA - Ok I just picked-up a Hitachi SATA 160 gig. It came with nothing but the Their web site says XPee comes with drivers. When I unplug my other drives, plug in only the Hitachi, enable SATA with the jumper, stick in my XPee Home full install..
K8V sata problem - I just recieved my k8v, processor and hard drive. Decided to go with a sata drive and try it. I the driver for the drive from the asus site. I have enabled it in the bios, disabled the promise as I only have 1 drive. I just wanted to..
|
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:35 pm
Post subject: SATA any better than ATA
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>mainboard>asus (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Mar 29, 2004
Posts: 731
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 6:08 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
sdzierza wrote:
> Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
Not really. TCQ helps a bit, but not really noticeable in usual home tasks,
the cables are nicer (smaller).
> is there a decent drive other than the Raptor
Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
wipes the floor with the rest.
> such as a 120 or larger made by a better company than the others?
Other what?
The Raptor 740GD can sustain reading and writing at over 60Megs/s - thats
astounding, my 360GD does 50Megs/s and it's just so fast. The 740GD has
increased transfer rates and decreased latency.
There are plenty of good drives, the Raptors are just a different league.
I've got a fast drive (WD360GD) and a large drive (WD2500JD).
HDTACH:
Transfers:
WD360GD & WD2500JD
Read:
Beginning: 60Megs/s
End: 36Megs/s
Average: 50Megs/s
WD2500JD write:
Beginning: 30Megs/s
End: 18Megs/s
Average: 25Megs/s
I don't have the write speeds to hand for the Raptor but is about the same
as read speeds (I can write a 300Meg file in ~7seconds.)
Random Seek:
WD360GD:
<9ms
WD2500 seek
14ms
Ben
--
A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</a>
Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Nov 07, 2003
Posts: 34
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 7:14 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
You have a 360GB drive - wow, my HP servers onlyy have 160GB drives. Amazing
unless, of course, you mean a 36GB drive.
"Ben Pope" <spam DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:c3hmq5$26eeg4$1@ID-191149.news.uni-berlin.de...
> sdzierza wrote:
> > Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
>
> Not really. TCQ helps a bit, but not really noticeable in usual home
tasks,
> the cables are nicer (smaller).
>
> > is there a decent drive other than the Raptor
>
> Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
> wipes the floor with the rest.
>
> > such as a 120 or larger made by a better company than the others?
>
>
> Other what?
>
> The Raptor 740GD can sustain reading and writing at over 60Megs/s - thats
> astounding, my 360GD does 50Megs/s and it's just so fast. The 740GD has
> increased transfer rates and decreased latency.
>
> There are plenty of good drives, the Raptors are just a different league.
>
> I've got a fast drive (WD360GD) and a large drive (WD2500JD).
>
> HDTACH:
>
> Transfers:
> WD360GD & WD2500JD
> Read:
> Beginning: 60Megs/s
> End: 36Megs/s
> Average: 50Megs/s
>
> WD2500JD write:
> Beginning: 30Megs/s
> End: 18Megs/s
> Average: 25Megs/s
>
> I don't have the write speeds to hand for the Raptor but is about the same
> as read speeds (I can write a 300Meg file in ~7seconds.)
>
> Random Seek:
> WD360GD:
> <9ms
> WD2500 seek
> 14ms
>
> Ben
> --
<font color=purple> > A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</font" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</font</a>>
> Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
> I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...
>
><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: 64
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:08:53 -0000, "Ben Pope" <spam DeleteThis @hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
>wipes the floor with the rest.
Not really according to some h/d tests in PCW (May issue). It was
*slightly* faster than the Hitachi Deskstar 7200 ATA 100. Wouldn't
notice the difference in normal use, i.e. without benchmarks.
Cheers,
Guy
** I may not be perfect, but I'm
** English, and that's the next best thing!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 22, 2004
Posts: 226
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 8:00 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dr Teeth wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:08:53 -0000, "Ben Pope" <spam DeleteThis @hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
>>wipes the floor with the rest.
>
>
> Not really according to some h/d tests in PCW (May issue). It was
> *slightly* faster than the Hitachi Deskstar 7200 ATA 100. Wouldn't
> notice the difference in normal use, i.e. without benchmarks.
>
>
SATA on a cheap motherboard that doesn't have PCI-X so
that you can use a good SATA controller doesn't give a
performance difference that you can detect without
benchmarks.
However, SATA in a workstation or server that has a good
PCI-X SATA controller can make an immediately noticeable
difference. Try building a system using something like
a Tyan S2885 as the foundation and the difference between
using four SATA drives in RAID 10 and four IDE drives in
RAID 10 will knock your socks off. Something like using
Drive Image to make an image of one partition and save that
image onto another partition will take about 30% less time.
(That is when using the four-port SATA controller built
onto the Tyan S2885 and hanging off of one of the PCI-X
buses. I'd love to see numbers comparing that controller
with something like one of the caching controllers from
3Ware.)
PCI-X will never show up on mainstream motherboards, but
PCI-Express should be coming soon to a motherboard near
you.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 30, 2004
Posts: 58
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= wrote:
> sdzierza wrote:
>> Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
> Not really. TCQ helps a bit, but not really noticeable in usual home tasks,
> the cables are nicer (smaller).
>
>> is there a decent drive other than the Raptor
> Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
> wipes the floor with the rest.
>
>> such as a 120 or larger made by a better company than the others?
> Other what?
>
> The Raptor 740GD can sustain reading and writing at over 60Megs/s - thats
> astounding, my 360GD does 50Megs/s and it's just so fast. The 740GD has
> increased transfer rates and decreased latency.
>
> There are plenty of good drives, the Raptors are just a different league.
>
> I've got a fast drive (WD360GD) and a large drive (WD2500JD).
>
> HDTACH:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach" target="_blank">http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach</a>
(read only trialware)
>
> Transfers:
> WD360GD & WD2500JD
> Read:
> Beginning: 60Megs/s
> End: 36Megs/s
> Average: 50Megs/s
>
To Compare,
I just tested my Maxtor Diamondmax 2megbuf 40Gig Pata133 (quiet mode)
with HDTach, no reboot so testing with >50+ windows and
extra services open ;]
Beginning: 64.5 MB/s
End: 39 MB/s
Average:52.1 MB/s
(holy smoke 
Maybe a different benchmark would bring out the Raptors strength ?
-Its got a good name anyway, wonder if its anything to do with jurassic
park?
--
' gathering moss,
andy<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 22, 2004
Posts: 226
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Creeping Stone wrote:
> =|[ Ben Pope's ]|= wrote:
>
>
>>sdzierza wrote:
>>
>>>Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
>>
>>Not really. TCQ helps a bit, but not really noticeable in usual home tasks,
>>the cables are nicer (smaller).
>>
>>
>>>is there a decent drive other than the Raptor
>>
>>Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
>>wipes the floor with the rest.
>>
>>
>>>such as a 120 or larger made by a better company than the others?
>>
>>Other what?
>>
>>The Raptor 740GD can sustain reading and writing at over 60Megs/s - thats
>>astounding, my 360GD does 50Megs/s and it's just so fast. The 740GD has
>>increased transfer rates and decreased latency.
>>
>>There are plenty of good drives, the Raptors are just a different league.
>>
>>I've got a fast drive (WD360GD) and a large drive (WD2500JD).
>>
>>HDTACH:
>
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach</font" target="_blank">http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach</font</a>>
> (read only trialware)
>
>>Transfers:
>>WD360GD & WD2500JD
>>Read:
>> Beginning: 60Megs/s
>> End: 36Megs/s
>> Average: 50Megs/s
>>
>
> To Compare,
> I just tested my Maxtor Diamondmax 2megbuf 40Gig Pata133 (quiet mode)
> with HDTach, no reboot so testing with >50+ windows and
> extra services open ;]
>
> Beginning: 64.5 MB/s
> End: 39 MB/s
> Average:52.1 MB/s
>
> (holy smoke
>
> Maybe a different benchmark would bring out the Raptors strength ?
>
I just did read-only HDTach (ver 2.70) on two drives
Max Min Average
Barracuda 7200.7 80 GB ATA 60.4 31.6 46.0
Barracude 7200.7 120 GB SATA 63.4 38.8 53.3
And an interesting result on something else ...
5400 rpm 40 GB Maxtor that is in that system
as the Master on the secondary IDE port:
with *idle* DVD drive as slave: 36.1 23.0 30.1
with DVD drive disconnected: 43.0 23.7 35.8
As with "Creeping Stone", I have lots of other things running
on this system that I didn't want to stop just to run a few
simple tests.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 02, 2004
Posts: 22
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Creeping Stone" <l DeleteThis @l.lll> wrote in message
news:wcuwfo19srxd.1x25kkailrrbb$.dlg@40tude.net...
> =|[ Ben Pope's ]|= wrote:
>
> > sdzierza wrote:
> >> Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
> > Not really. TCQ helps a bit, but not really noticeable in usual home
tasks,
> > the cables are nicer (smaller).
> >
> >> is there a decent drive other than the Raptor
> > Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and
thus
> > wipes the floor with the rest.
> >
> >> such as a 120 or larger made by a better company than the others?
> > Other what?
> >
> > The Raptor 740GD can sustain reading and writing at over 60Megs/s -
thats
> > astounding, my 360GD does 50Megs/s and it's just so fast. The 740GD has
> > increased transfer rates and decreased latency.
> >
> > There are plenty of good drives, the Raptors are just a different
league.
> >
> > I've got a fast drive (WD360GD) and a large drive (WD2500JD).
> >
> > HDTACH:
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach</font" target="_blank">http://www.simplisoftware.com/Public/index.php?request=HdTach</font</a>>
> (read only trialware)
> >
> > Transfers:
> > WD360GD & WD2500JD
> > Read:
> > Beginning: 60Megs/s
> > End: 36Megs/s
> > Average: 50Megs/s
> >
> To Compare,
> I just tested my Maxtor Diamondmax 2megbuf 40Gig Pata133 (quiet mode)
> with HDTach, no reboot so testing with >50+ windows and
> extra services open ;]
>
> Beginning: 64.5 MB/s
> End: 39 MB/s
> Average:52.1 MB/s
>
> (holy smoke
>
> Maybe a different benchmark would bring out the Raptors strength ?
>
> -Its got a good name anyway, wonder if its anything to do with jurassic
> park?
> --
> ' gathering moss,
> andy
Apart from the jurassic park use, a raptor is a carnivarous bird of prey.
Eagles, hawks, vultures, owls, etc are all raptors. They probably were
trying to link to the "speed" of eagles and hawks.
Billh<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 29, 2004
Posts: 731
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:10 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
John Smith wrote:
> You have a 360GB drive - wow, my HP servers onlyy have 160GB drives.
> Amazing unless, of course, you mean a 36GB drive.
Where did I say 360GB? I said 360GD, which is the model number.
Ben
--
A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</a>
Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 29, 2004
Posts: 731
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:22 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Dr Teeth wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2004 15:08:53 -0000, "Ben Pope" <spam RemoveThis @hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Not really... I think the Raptor is still the only 10K RPM drive and thus
>> wipes the floor with the rest.
>
> Not really according to some h/d tests in PCW (May issue). It was
> *slightly* faster than the Hitachi Deskstar 7200 ATA 100. Wouldn't
> notice the difference in normal use, i.e. without benchmarks.
Is that in reading AND writing? Is that in seek times?
If you're comparing sequential read, I'll believe you. For anything that
requires seeking, the Raptor will win hands down. The Hitachi looks like an
impressive drive but my experience of Deathstars (admittedly, when they were
IBM) thus far has not been good - they're fast drives that have a tendency
to die. If you believe the MTBF specs, then pleas explain how, about 2
years ago I was sitting in the same room as 5 people (out of maybe 30) who
have had one die on them? The odds of that would be pretty damn small.
The GXP75 was a quick drive for it's time, they were the most unreliable
drive ever. My GXP60 died within a year and was replaced by a GXP120, that,
although is still going, has always made a weird noise coupled with a second
or two of inability to access it maybe once or twice a day.
Ben
--
A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</a>
Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 29, 2004
Posts: 731
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:25 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Creeping Stone wrote:
> =|[ Ben Pope's ]|= wrote:
>
>> Transfers:
>> WD360GD & WD2500JD
>> Read:
>> Beginning: 60Megs/s
>> End: 36Megs/s
>> Average: 50Megs/s
>>
> To Compare,
> I just tested my Maxtor Diamondmax 2megbuf 40Gig Pata133 (quiet mode)
> with HDTach, no reboot so testing with >50+ windows and
> extra services open ;]
>
> Beginning: 64.5 MB/s
> End: 39 MB/s
> Average:52.1 MB/s
>
> (holy smoke
>
> Maybe a different benchmark would bring out the Raptors strength ?
Same benchmark, but the figure you missed out - seek times.
Ben
--
A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</a>
Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 06, 2004
Posts: 80
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
sdzierza schrieb:
>
> Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
The longer, less obstructive data cables can be a relief. Apart from
that, performance on equivalent PATA and SATA drives (say, Samsung's
SP1614N and SP1614C) is so close that it can be considered identical.
Stephan
--
Meine Andere Seite: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://stephan.win31.de/" target="_blank">http://stephan.win31.de/</a>
PC#6: i440BX, 2xCel300A, 512 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W
This is a SCSI-inside, Legacy-plus, TCPA-free computer 
Reply to newsgroup only. | See home page for working e-mail address.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 29, 2004
Posts: 731
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:47 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Stephan Grossklass wrote:
> sdzierza schrieb:
>>
>> Is there any benefit from using a SATA drive,
>
> The longer, less obstructive data cables can be a relief. Apart from
> that, performance on equivalent PATA and SATA drives (say, Samsung's
> SP1614N and SP1614C) is so close that it can be considered identical.
Thats 'cos it's probably the same drive - the SATA one likely has a PATA to
SATA bridge chip.
Disk performance is not usually limited by the ATA interface, but by the
mechanics of the drive.
Ben
--
A7N8X FAQ: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html" target="_blank">www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html</a>
Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Mar 06, 2004
Posts: 80
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 10:54 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Creeping Stone schrieb:
>
> Maybe a different benchmark would bring out the Raptors strength ?
I'd suggest <http://storagereview.com/comparison.html>. You'll find the
74 gig Raptor right among the 15k SCSI crowd when it comes to desktop
performance. The older 36 gig model is quite a bit slower, barely
winning against the 7K250. (Which still isn't too shabby.)
> -Its got a good name anyway, wonder if its anything to do with jurassic
> park?
I'd be amazed if it didn't. (Fortunately, the WD models are rather tame
and don't bite.
Stephan
--
Meine Andere Seite: <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://stephan.win31.de/" target="_blank">http://stephan.win31.de/</a>
PC#6: i440BX, 2xCel300A, 512 MiB, 18+80 GB, R9k AGP 64 MiB, 110W
This is a SCSI-inside, Legacy-plus, TCPA-free computer
Reply to newsgroup only. | See home page for working e-mail address.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 30, 2004
Posts: 58
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 11:00 pm
Post subject: Re: SATA any better than ATA [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
=|[ Ben Pope's ]|= wrote:
> Creeping Stone wrote:
>> =|[ Ben Pope's ]|= wrote:
>>
>>> Transfers:
>>> WD360GD & WD2500JD
>>> Read:
>>> Beginning: 60Megs/s
>>> End: 36Megs/s
>>> Average: 50Megs/s
>>>
>> To Compare,
>> I just tested my Maxtor Diamondmax 2megbuf 40Gig Pata133 (quiet mode)
>> with HDTach, no reboot so testing with >50+ windows and
>> extra services open ;]
>>
>> Beginning: 64.5 MB/s
>> End: 39 MB/s
>> Average:52.1 MB/s
>>
>> (holy smoke
>> Maybe a different benchmark would bring out the Raptors strength ?
> Same benchmark, but the figure you missed out - seek times.
Random access: 14.1 ms,
- so thats a bit slower, tho acoustic management is on.
The Maxtors transfer rates are better, thats not what I expected.
Im not saying its as good as a Raptor in other respects,
but it was cheap and holds its own in this bench (
Its a pity HDTach wouldn't test the Ramdrive :]
--
'pief;]t<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: SATA any better than ATA |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in/Register/Password
