> I tried the Samsung after I posted the message and I wasn't very
> impressed. The whites (as others have said) looked more like a cream
> than white and I didn't care for that.
Yes, the picture quality wasn't too impressive for me either. The screen on
that display just isn't good enough. I used to have a Samsung 171S before
that (HD15 only) and I felt the quality was much better. The 171S was a TN
rather than a PVA of the 181/191T, probably reason why, sacrifising large
viewing angles.
>
> However, anyone who says that they can't tell the difference between
> the Analog and DVI input to these monitors is smoking something. It
> is a very big difference in quality in my eye.
>
Yep, I too did notice a difference, however the differences were subtle. One
thing though, animations, video an games were smoother wwith analogue than
DVI - probably due to bandwidth limitations on DVI. This was tried on a
Radeon 8500.
> BTW, can you define "ghost" for me?
Same as what is understood by everyone else. Very blurry fast motion in
video/DVD, severe lag times in games, video etc. It's a shame one has to put
up with it for such expensive equipment. Gone back to a lovely Trinitron for
less than half the price of the TFT, brand new!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Samsung 191T vs. Sony SDM-HS93 LCD Monitor