Wes Newell <w.newell.TakeThisOut@TAKEOUTverizon.net> wrote in message news:<pan.2004.12.02.23.05.14.946896.TakeThisOut@TAKEOUTverizon.net>...
> On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 05:50:50 -0800, Alan wrote:
>
> > I've been thinking about this off and on for a while now, but would I
> > be beter putting one of these (XP-M 2500+)
<font color=green> > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.cpucitystore.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=392</font" target="_blank">http://www.cpucitystore.co.uk/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=392</font</a>>
> >
> > or one of these (XP 2400+)
> >
<font color=green> > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.theredhotgroup.com/product_info.php?products_id=1684</font" target="_blank">http://www.theredhotgroup.com/product_info.php?products_id=1684</font</a>>
> >
> > Im my old but still reliable Abit Kt7A (1.3) to replace my Athlon
> > 1400?
> >
> > What would each one require to get it working? I believe the 2400+
> > even if locked would work without changing much (if only defaulting to
> > 20x100)- would the XP-M?
>
> There's several that use mobiles in the KT7A, and IIRC the most you might
> have to do is set the max multiplier, and I'm not sure if even that's
> required. Most of these will run at 2400MHz and higher.
Thanks Wes,
So would I be correct in saying I'll need to do the wire mod to get
the higher multipliers, or can I just select 9x to map it to 17x in
the BIOS?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: XP-M 2500+ or XP 2400+ for KT7a