"JAD" <jdemma25.RemoveThis@eartink.net> wrote in message
news:Y_Hhc.18253$l75.10016@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> typical he didn't ask for a comparison of a celery to an amd. but
> you guys just can't resists a sales pitch....
> It matters on what the heck your going to do with it. office word
> processing? Doing a little web surfing and email...go for it
>
>
A quote from the article referred to, in regards to scores on Business
Winstone 2004:
"What's also important to note is that a score of a 10.0 here is about the
performance level of a 1GHz Pentium III, which should help you put the
Celeron's performance in perspective."
Me writing:
The Celeron 2.6GHz scored 13.7.
The Pentium4 1.8GHz scored 15.4.
The Athlon 1.83GHz scored 20.1. (PR rating 2500+)
Yes, the Celeron does suck and it is not worth having when so much better
performance can be had for equal or less money.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: why celeron is not good? or is it good