In article <41E757D6.7000705.DeleteThis@prodigy.net>, CJT <abujlehc.DeleteThis@prodigy.net> wrote:
>Joe Samangitak wrote:
>> I have a choice between two drives, I can only choose ONE:
>>
>> The IBM Deskstar 22GXP (13GB)
>> or the Quantum Fireball LM15 (15GB)
>>
>> Question is, which is more reliable? I like the idea of the extra 2GB,
>> but the Quantum is the noisiest drive I've ever heard, making
>> crunching sounds like its going to die any minute. The IBM on the
>> other hand, occasionally makes a shuddering series of clicky sounds
>> that makes you think it just trashed your data (but its otherwise okay
>> and not noisy).
>>
>> I can live with the noises, but if one drive has a better rep for
>> reliability, I'll probably lean towards that one.
>
>That sounds like a choice between a rock and a hard place.
>
>Surely you can do better.
>
>--
>The e-mail address in our reply-to line is reversed in an attempt to
>minimize spam. Our true address is of the form che....DeleteThis@prodigy.net.
IMO; if there is no hard-case that one or the other is crap, it
doesn't make any difference which one you buy because you need to plan
your backup as if your disk is going to die RIGHT NOW, anyway.
--
a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m
Don't blame me. I voted for Gore.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Which drive is more reliable; Quantum or IBM?