On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:28:36 GMT, Unknown <epaton DeleteThis @localhost.com>
wrote:
>
>thanks, its a works laptop i would be getting for buttons so i could just
>take in a knopix disk and cay /proc/cpuinfo it
>
>will the prescot be as bad as i imagine or with the 1meg cache could
>it be ok.
Without knowing much about your imagination, that's tough for me to
judge! The Prescott and Northwood chips do perform somewhat
differently on different applications. In some situations Northwood
is faster, in other situations Prescott is faster. However given
otherwise identical systems, the difference between the two chips
averages out to them being about equal, clock for clock.
The real downside to Prescott in a laptop setting is that it tends to
consume more power, though you've already mentioned that this isn't a
big concern. For reference though, the TDP of the mobile Northwood
2.8GHz P4 is 68.4W, the TDP for the mobile Prescott 2.8GHz is 88.0W.
The only chip you *REALLY* want to avoid is the Celeron. The
performance of this chip is absolutely abysmal, a 2.0GHz P4 easily
match or beat a 2.8GHz Celeron.
-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca
>> Stay informed about: intel 2800mhz mobile cpu question