On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:52:09 +0800, "Stanley Chu"
<cstanley1.TakeThisOut@sinaman.com> wrote:
>Thank you very much for your valuable information. Does this mean that I
>can add up to 512mb of ram without any performance hit because it seems that
>it is the cpu's L2 on-board cache that matters rather than the L3 external
>cache.
<snip>
Performance for simple operations might be reduced slightly but
not noticeably with 512MB. Perfromance could be increased (by
preventing or reducing virtual memory swapping) if you are heavily
multitasking or using a huge amount of data.
With Write Back caching disabled (the normal situation), a K6-3
caches everything in its L1 and L2 cache, and the VA-503+
motherboard caches 255MB as an L3 cache. 255, not 256.
In 2001 I measured a 0 to 3 percent faster speed in Graphics
Winbench 96 using 256MB versus 255MB (via "MaxPhysPage=FF00" in
system.ini). Search for "MVP3 (VA-503+) benchmark results with
256MB memory?" on Google Groups Search for details.
I did not compare speeds with 256MB and 384MB of memory. I did not
try 512MB of memory.
Too many memory chips made my VA-503+ inoperable. 27 chips worked
on mine but 36 chips did not. 512MB will probably work for you if
it comprises a total of 16 (18 for ECC) 8-bit wide chips.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Is the maximum memory that can be cached by 1m VA503+ 320mb?