On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:18:41 +0000, Wes Newell wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:25:21 +0000, Homer J. Simpson wrote:
>
>> "Wes Newell" <w.newell RemoveThis @TAKEOUTverizon.net> wrote in message
>>> There are no sensors in the cpu. The sensors are a part of the MB. And
>>> btw, both of the cpu's being barton cores are the same inside.
>>>
>> You're wrong. Take a look at AMD's data sheet for the Athlon XP's. They
>> all have an on-die thermal diode. What's done with the signal from the
>> thermal diode is all handled by the motherboard.
>
> No, I'm not wrong. The diode isn't the sensor. It is the device the sensor
> takes a reading from to calculate the temp. If they call it a sensor in
> the the data sheets, then the data sheets are wrong. I didn't look, nor do
> I have to look. I know how the crap works. The actual sensor chip can be
> one of many. The one on this baord happens to be an IT8712F IIRC. The
> sensor takes it's reading from the onboard diode of the cpu. A lot of
> boards use the Winbond chips too.
Having thought about this for a minute, I will admit that the diode could
be referenced as a sensor of sorts, but it by no means actually gives any
temps, just voltages that are read by the actual sensor chips that are on
the MB. So, I recant, hoping everyone realizes that it's still just a part
of the sensor circuit and is absolutely worthless without a sensor chip on
the MB. Which I think was what the original poster was wanting to know.
Both cpu's have the same diode as the are the same core.
--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
My server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php" target="_blank">http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php</a>
Verizon server <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm" target="_blank">http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm</a><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: Do the mobile Athlon XP's have on-board temp sensors/diodes?