|
Next: waterproof case for canon S50 required
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 25, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2003 5:07 pm
Post subject: Digital Cameras are nonsense!
Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>dcameras (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 25 Sep 2003 14:07:43 -0700, pellus_torr DeleteThis @yahoo.com (Peter Mollror)
typed:
>The quality of pictures is catastrphally bad !
>
>Better use a real camera!
First, get Spelling for Dummies.
Then get Windows for Dummies.
Next, get Usenet for Dummies.
Finally, get Trolling for Dummies.
The $20 digital camera you probably got is not a representative of the
quality of the real digital cams. Neither is the web cams. A 5 megapix
camera and a high quality printer with photo quality paper and even some
photographers would have a hard time telling apart digital pictures from
real pictures.
----
space for rent.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Aug 02, 2003
Posts: 17
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:14 am
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Chemical film cameras should be banned on environmental basis.
"Impmon" <Impmon DeleteThis @tds.net> wrote in message
news:m1q6nv416c0aamteirvavs6ijj4kep5ijj@4ax.com...
> On 25 Sep 2003 14:07:43 -0700, pellus_torr DeleteThis @yahoo.com (Peter Mollror)
> typed:
>
> >The quality of pictures is catastrphally bad !
> >
> >Better use a real camera!
>
> First, get Spelling for Dummies.
> Then get Windows for Dummies.
> Next, get Usenet for Dummies.
> Finally, get Trolling for Dummies.
>
> The $20 digital camera you probably got is not a representative of the
> quality of the real digital cams. Neither is the web cams. A 5 megapix
> camera and a high quality printer with photo quality paper and even some
> photographers would have a hard time telling apart digital pictures from
> real pictures.
> ----
> space for rent.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 25, 2003
Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 1:16 am
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
pellus_torr.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com (Peter Mollror) wrote in
news:6434f4fa.0309251307.51c50028@posting.google.com:
> The quality of pictures is catastrphally bad !
>
> Better use a real camera!
Bzzt! Only hit a 1.5 out of 10 on the old troll meter. Nice try;
come back when you've leared how.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 3:15 am
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Peter Mollror wrote:
> The quality of pictures is catastrphally bad !
> Better use a real camera!
Keyboards are so lame !!
Better use a pen.
--
XandreX
/I'm that kind of people your parents warned you about/<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 6:08 am
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:51:09 -0400, Gymmie Bob <NoThanx.RemoveThis@notspam.com> wrote:
>Chemical film cameras should be banned on environmental basis.
I bet if you look at our landfills in a hundred years, you'll see a lot
more disposed digital camera bodies than you'll see old film.
Nobody who buys cameras only to throw them away as obsolete every 3-4
years can take the environmental high ground.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 11, 2003
Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 12:15 pm
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <6434f4fa.0309251307.51c50028 RemoveThis @posting.google.com>, pellus_torr RemoveThis @yahoo.com (Peter Mollror) wrote:
>The quality of pictures is catastrphally bad !
>
>Better use a real camera!
TROLL ALERT !!!
--
remove_clothes to answer over email<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 5
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Fri Sep 26, 2003 7:02 pm
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 26 Sep 2003 03:08:16 GMT, TCS <The.Central.Scrutinizer.TakeThisOut@p.o.b.o.x.com>
typed:
>I bet if you look at our landfills in a hundred years, you'll see a lot
>more disposed digital camera bodies than you'll see old film.
>Nobody who buys cameras only to throw them away as obsolete every 3-4
>years can take the environmental high ground.
Obsolete cell phone takes up even more because more people uses them
than digital cams.
----
space for rent.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2003 2:49 am
Post subject: Re: Digital Cameras are nonsense! [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:02:32 GMT, Impmon <Impmon.TakeThisOut@tds.net> wrote:
>On 26 Sep 2003 03:08:16 GMT, TCS <The.Central.Scrutinizer.TakeThisOut@p.o.b.o.x.com>
>typed:
>>I bet if you look at our landfills in a hundred years, you'll see a lot
>>more disposed digital camera bodies than you'll see old film.
>>Nobody who buys cameras only to throw them away as obsolete every 3-4
>>years can take the environmental high ground.
>Obsolete cell phone takes up even more because more people uses them
>than digital cams.
so?<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: Digital Cameras are nonsense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
