 |
|
 |
|
Next: $35 CD Buners
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jan 09, 2004 Posts: 12
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:25 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>comp>hardware (more info?)
|
|
|
Mr w-tom,
You were not there. 220 volts was measured on the line with a digital
voltmeter. Believe what you want, it happened. My main point was that most
of the computers survived with minor or no damage, even though the surge
protectors blew out. It was good protection for the price.
MrB
"w_tom" <w_tom1 DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:400D8CE3.B638D6CE@hotmail.com...
> First, a bad neutral does not create 220 volts on 120 volt
> wires. It creates something typically much less than 220
> volts.
>
> Second, how many of those power supplies are universal type
> - good for all voltages from 90 to 265 volts AC?
>
> Third, as posted by another, those surge protector are only
> for very short duration spikes. Even worse, a transient too
> small to damage the computer can damage those protectors
> leaving computer completely exposed.
>
> Fourth, even Computer Business Equipment Manufacturer's
> group specs (a most minimal spec) required 120 VAC equipment
> to withstand voltages up to 600 without damage. Other
> conditions apply beyond the scope of this discussion. But the
> point remains - computers are some of the most resilient
> electronics in the building. Plug-in protector doesn't offer
> effective solutions, in part, because that protection already
> exists inside power supply.
>
> Neutral line problems can result in 130+ volts on AC line.
> Made obvious because even 126+ volts causes incandescent light
> bulbs to last less than 1/2 their hours of life expectancy.
> And yet every electronic must have no problems with voltages
> even at 130+.
>
> Again, more facts that overpriced, undersized plug-in
> electrical solutions forget to mention. Profits being too
> high to tell all facts. If that plug-in UPS does not have a
> dedicated earthing connection, OR if it forgets to even
> discuss earthing, then it does not provide effective transient
> protection ... which is why they avoid all discussion about
> earthing to make the sale.
>
> MrB wrote:
> > Two weeks ago, we had a power problem in which the neutral became
> > ineffective. Somehow, this put 220 on 110 volt lines. There were
> > six computers running, plus some printers. They were all plugged
> > into modestly priced surge protectors. All of the SP's blew out.
> > One even burned slightly. Four of the computers still functioned
> > properly. One required a PS change in is back on line. The other
> > failed computer is so old, I cannot find a power supply for it.
> > The printers survived. Since we had just moved the equipment
> > into a new (old) building, I insisted on new SP's for everything.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 10, 2003 Posts: 416
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:25 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
If 220 vac existed, then verify integrity of your earth
ground system. For those readings to exist, then 220 volts
was also in your earthing system - unacceptable and
potentially dangerous. You were suffering a failure
equivalent to the house with exploding gas meter. 220 volts
not possible if the earthing system is intact. It may not be
your earthing connection either. See pictures for examples of
what to look for on utility pole with transformer:
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html" target="_blank">http://www.tvtower.com/fpl.html</a>
Now if that volt reading was correct, how many incandescent
bulbs blew out immediately? If that 220 volts did not damage
incandescent bulbs immediately, then something is seriously
inconsistent; 220 volts did not exist.
Again, if surge protector blew out, then protector provided
no protection as V W Wall notes. Protectors blew out - maybe
vaporized - stopped providing any protection because they were
undersized. In the meantime, 220 volts continued past 'burned
out' protector and directly into PC.
Too many inconsistencies. 1) Surge protector vaporized in
milliseconds - became nonexistent - but computer confronted
220 volts for minutes after the protector failed. That means
computer protected itself while surge protectors remained
nonexistent. 2) 220 volts on 120 volt circuit - but it did
not immediately blow out incandescent bulbs (and many every
other appliances)? Not possible. 3) 220 volts on 120 volt
circuit but earthing grounds intact? Not possible.
Facts as were posted are not consistent. If that 220 volts
did exist, then, first, you have a serious - very serious -
human safety problem in that missing earthing system.
MrB wrote:
> You were not there. 220 volts was measured on the line with a digital
> voltmeter. Believe what you want, it happened. My main point was that
> most of the computers survived with minor or no damage, even though
> the surge protectors blew out. It was good protection for the price.
> MrB<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 10, 2003 Posts: 416
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:25 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Important point to all lurkers. One indication of a missing
neutral is quickly identified by snow. If snow is melting
first around that earth ground rod, then a potentially
defective neutral should be visually inspected.
MrB wrote:
> You were not there. 220 volts was measured on the line with a digital
> voltmeter. Believe what you want, it happened. My main point was that
> most of the computers survived with minor or no damage, even though
> the surge protectors blew out. It was good protection for the price.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 03, 2004 Posts: 7693
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 6:01 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:53:13 -0800, "Not so quick"
<goodideaSSPPAAMM.RemoveThis@lvcm.com> wrote:
>
>"Mike Walsh" <mikew137.RemoveThis@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>news:400CC547.F0427D91@sbcglobal.net...
>>
>> A good UPS will kick in when the voltage sags instead of only when power
>is completely lost. The Belkin UPS I am using now is set to kick in when the
>line voltage drops to 95 volts.
>>
>> Not so quick wrote:
>> >
>> > You didn't mention sags. It seems to me that I get a lot
>> > of lights blinking off and on. Two or three times a week.
>> > Sometimes the computer resets.
>>
>> --
>> Mike Walsh
>> West Palm Beach, Florida, U.S.A.
>
>Do you consider sags and short total interruptions to be
>a cause of computer problems? Do you have an idea why
>the lights seem to flicker and the computer screen does too?
>
If you feel the problem starts within your home, you need to contact
an electrician to resolve this. If it starts outside your home you
need to contact the electric co. A solution specific to the computer
might include a quality power supply, preferribly with Active PFC,
which are the type typically accepting wider range of voltages without
a voltage selector switch on the back.
As for an UPS, the mid-to-high end models may have a line conditioner
built in, may actually call it a conditioner or perhaps some mention
of voltage regulation.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 03, 2004 Posts: 7693
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:44 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:04:58 -0500, w_tom <w_tom1.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Important point to all lurkers. One indication of a missing
>neutral is quickly identified by snow. If snow is melting
>first around that earth ground rod, then a potentially
>defective neutral should be visually inspected.
>
Where to find snow? Ebay?
 <!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 05, 2004 Posts: 28
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:20 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
MrB wrote:
>
> Mr w-tom,
>
> You were not there. 220 volts was measured on the line with a digital
> voltmeter. Believe what you want, it happened. My main point was that most
> of the computers survived with minor or no damage, even though the surge
> protectors blew out. It was good protection for the price.
> MrB
>
I can believe the voltage. See my reply to w_tom. A surge protector is
designed to protect from very short spikes, not sustained high voltage.
They usually "blow" after carrying enough current to cause them to destruct,
allowing them to become an open circuit. Since they are placed across the
incoming line, the line voltage will remain the same after their destruction.
Many surge protectors contain their own over current protection. The MOVs
could well draw enough current to trip this device before they themselves
were destroyed. This would protect the attached loads, and could well leave
the line circuit breaker untripped. In this case, with the load being removed,
the line voltage would be close to 220 V, even with a small load on the other
side of the circuit, since the voltmeter draws very little current.
The ground wire has nothing to do with what happens with an open neutral.
It's only purpose is for safety. It is connected to the neutral(s) only
at the service entry point. If the neutral becomes open, the return path
for the circuit is through the load on the other side of the 120/240 V
circuit to the other "hot" wire, with 240 V between the two "hot" wires.
Virg Wall
--
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 11, 2004 Posts: 616
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 2:56 pm
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
kony wrote:
> w_tom <w_tom1 RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Important point to all lurkers. One indication of a missing
> > neutral is quickly identified by snow. If snow is melting
> > first around that earth ground rod, then a potentially
> > defective neutral should be visually inspected.
>
> Where to find snow? Ebay?
>
You are welcome to all of mine. No charge, provided you pick it
up yourself.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer@yahoo.com) (cbfalconer@worldnet.att.net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 42
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 3:55 pm
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"w_tom" <w_tom1.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:400D8C01.B1BB5A7A@hotmail.com...
> A sag is a brownout. All computers must work just fine even
> when 120 VAC drops (sags) to 90 VAC. This was a defacto
> standard 30 years ago and is required in Intel ATX specs.
> That means AC voltage drops so low that incandescent lamps are
> at maybe 35% intensity. How often does your voltage drop that
> low?
>
> Yes, not all power supplies meet those specs. We see them
> often because too many in N America only purchase using one
> spec - price. Power supplies must contain many functions.
> How to sell a power supply at higher profit? Forget to add
> those functions and sell it for maybe $40. Too many computer
> experts don't even understand basic electrical concepts which
> is why too many clone computer users have strange problems.
> Posted above are numbers found in the numerical specs provides
> by acceptable power supplies. Information that minimally
> acceptable power supplies provide because they actually meet
> those specs.
>
> Then we have people who fix things without first learning
> why the problem exists. Their solutions include 500 watt
> power supplies (Home Improvement's "More Power" solution) and
> plug-in UPSes. Expensive solutions because the original
> supply was not purchased based upon technical requirements.
> All computers must work just fine - even startup with the
> maximum load of peripherals - when 120 VAC line is only 90
> VAC. That 90 VAC is called a sag or brownout.
>
> If power is lost for more than 15 milliseconds, then a
> computer can shutdown. This can result in data loss on FAT
> filesystem disks. Just another reason we want NTFS
> filesystems on our hard drives - or need a UPS for data
> protection.
>
> Not so quick wrote:
> > You didn't mention sags. It seems to me that I get a lot
> > of lights blinking off and on. Two or three times a week.
> > Sometimes the computer resets.
I was using 'incorrectly'. Is there a name for a power interruption
that lasts > 15 milliseconds but not long enough to be considered
an outage? I would say like .5 seconds. Thanks : -) This has
been a very instructional thread to me.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 10, 2003 Posts: 416
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 7:59 pm
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
The 'greater than 15 millisecond' power loss would be a
blackout. All power supplies have internal electricity (300+
volts) stored in capacitors. All properly constructed
supplies must exceed 15 milliseconds of power loss (blackout)
so that, for example, the UPS can switch a relay from AC mains
to UPS battery. Relays take 10+ milliseconds to respond.
If a power supply is much larger than its load, then power
supply may take longer to discharge those input capacitors.
The spec is for full load:
> Hold up time, full load: 16ms. typical
What is power off or shutdown? When power is removed,
those capacitors discharge, and power supply goes into
brownout; then blackout. IOW some will claim that brownouts
can damage hardware. If true, then power off (shutdown) will
also damage hardware.
Power supply will either supply full voltage to the
important DC voltage outputs - or shutdown. In fact, the
signal wire called Power Good is the supply telling
motherboard that all voltages are OK. Either all DC voltages
remain in spec - or power supply cuts off all voltages and
removes the Power Good signal.
We would routinely test electronic designs to see how low
voltage would really go. Typically, power supplies would work
just fine down to 85 VAC; then shutdown. One even reported a
Sony TV that worked just fine down to 65 VAC. Everything must
exceed specs to meet specs. So, 80 VAC to that Sony TV would
really not be a brownout or blackout - from TV's perspective.
What happens if power is lost for more than 16 milliseconds
and power supply keeps working? What could have been a
blackout was not - from perspective of a lightly loaded
computer power supply. And so there is a fuzzy line between
blackout and brownout. What must be asked is from which
perspective - utility's or power supply's?
80 VAC would be a brownout so low as to be a violation of
utility specifications. During heavy load usage, utility
cannot let 120 VAC drop (brownout) more than 5%. Even 3%
voltage drop is considered a major event. If they cannot
maintain above 5% brownout, then utility must shed load (cut
off power).
Just some background material as to what power supplies do
and what they may confront.
Not so quick wrote:
> I was using 'incorrectly'. Is there a name for a power interruption
> that lasts > 15 milliseconds but not long enough to be considered
> an outage? I would say like .5 seconds. Thanks : -) This has
> been a very instructional thread to me.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 10, 2003 Posts: 416
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Those in warmer climates suffer because they don't have some
of nature's fabulous testing equipment. Snow around earth
ground rod being good safety device. When a neutral fails,
then earth ground rod and other wires (such as CATV wire) take
up current from a missing neutral. Snow then melts faster at
the rod which is also why voltage would not climb to 220
volts.
In one case, because earth ground was missing, then phones
in other neighborhood homes rang continuously. Electricity
used the CATV wire and phone wires to complete a circuit
created by a failed neutral and home's missing earth ground.
Utility emergency response used fire department infrared
vision to find the offending house and locate a red hot CATV
wire inside walls. Just another example of why earth ground
is important for human safety - to pick up currents normally
carried by a neutral wire. Again, - attention lurkers - if
snow (or frost) is melting first around earth ground rod, then
homeowner should verify integrity of his neutral wire.
Earth ground rod (if properly installed) is but another
reason why 220 volts would not appear on that 120 volt main.
220 volts on a 120 volt circuit means house had much more
problems than just a failed neutral.
Increased voltage (that is much less than 220 volts) due to
a failed neutral could be why incandescent light bulbs burn
out every month - prematurely. They do have light bulbs even
where 'snow don't go'.
kony wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 22:04:58 -0500, w_tom <w_tom1.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Important point to all lurkers. One indication of a missing
>> neutral is quickly identified by snow. If snow is melting
>> first around that earth ground rod, then a potentially
>> defective neutral should be visually inspected.
>
> Where to find snow? Ebay?
>
>  <!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 10, 2003 Posts: 416
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2004 8:34 pm
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Surge protectors do not remove load (disconnect computer)
from AC mains upon failure. That indicator light simply says
a surge protector's components (MOVs) are disconnected from AC
mains while appliance still remains connected to AC main.
What kind of protection was that? Surge protector
disconnected in millisecond while computer continued to
confront excessive line voltage for many minutes? That means
the surge protector never protected computer. Computer
protected itself.
UL1449 2nd Edition is why surge protector components must
disconnect - so that they don't start a fire - as mid 1980
surge protectors once did. Typically, only tiny thermal fuse
to MOVs blow. Now the surge protector is equivalent to a
power strip. Power strip surge protector never protected
those computers. Protector simply did as UL1449 demands -
disconnected the surge protector components so as to not
create fire. It is a tiny thermal fuse that blows so that
surge protector does not burn. That is what the silly
indicator light says. The tiny thermal fuse disconnected
surge protector components from AC main.
How pathetically informative is that indicator light? MOVs
are removed from a more expensive protector - and that light
still says everything is OK!
<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/movs.html" target="_blank">http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/movs.html</a>
V W Wall wrote:
> I can believe the voltage. See my reply to w_tom. A surge
> protector is designed to protect from very short spikes, not
> sustained high voltage. They usually "blow" after carrying enough
> current to cause them to destruct, allowing them to become an open
> circuit. Since they are placed across the incoming line, the line
> voltage will remain the same after their destruction.
>
> Many surge protectors contain their own over current protection.
> The MOVs could well draw enough current to trip this device
> before they themselves were destroyed. This would protect the
> attached loads, and could well leave the line circuit breaker
> untripped. In this case, with the load being removed, the line
> voltage would be close to 220 V, even with a small load on the
> other side of the circuit, since the voltmeter draws very little
> current.
>
> The ground wire has nothing to do with what happens with an open
> neutral. It's only purpose is for safety. It is connected to the
> neutral(s) only at the service entry point. If the neutral
> becomes open, the return path for the circuit is through the load
> on the other side of the 120/240 V circuit to the other "hot"
> wire, with 240 V between the two "hot" wires.<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 05, 2004 Posts: 28
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2004 2:34 am
Post subject: Re: power supply [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
w_tom wrote:
>
> Surge protectors do not remove load (disconnect computer)
> from AC mains upon failure.
Many "surge protectors" are in the form of a power strip as you
mention below. These often have over-current protection in the form
of a circuit breaker, which upon overload, will isolate the strip
from the line. Before failing, the MOV(s) may well draw enough
current to trip that breaker. The computer is then isolated from
the malfunctioning line.
That indicator light simply says
> a surge protector's components (MOVs) are disconnected from AC
> mains while appliance still remains connected to AC main.
> What kind of protection was that? Surge protector
> disconnected in millisecond while computer continued to
> confront excessive line voltage for many minutes? That means
> the surge protector never protected computer. Computer
> protected itself.
Nobody has mentioned an indicator light before. More FUD!
>
> UL1449 2nd Edition is why surge protector components must
> disconnect - so that they don't start a fire - as mid 1980
> surge protectors once did. Typically, only tiny thermal fuse
> to MOVs blow. Now the surge protector is equivalent to a
> power strip. Power strip surge protector never protected
> those computers. Protector simply did as UL1449 demands -
> disconnected the surge protector components so as to not
> create fire. It is a tiny thermal fuse that blows so that
> surge protector does not burn. That is what the silly
> indicator light says. The tiny thermal fuse disconnected
> surge protector components from AC main.
Many "surge protectors" do not have indicator lamps. They must
demonstrate that the MOVs fail in an open circuit mode before
reaching an excessive temperature.
>
> How pathetically informative is that indicator light? MOVs
> are removed from a more expensive protector - and that light
> still says everything is OK!
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/movs.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/movs.html</font</a>>
This company, (Zero Surge), makes surge protectors that do not use
MOVs. Obviously they do like those that do! More FUD!
>
> V W Wall wrote:
> > I can believe the voltage. See my reply to w_tom. A surge
> > protector is designed to protect from very short spikes, not
> > sustained high voltage. They usually "blow" after carrying enough
> > current to cause them to destruct, allowing them to become an open
> > circuit. Since they are placed across the incoming line, the line
> > voltage will remain the same after their destruction.
> >
> > Many surge protectors contain their own over current protection.
> > The MOVs could well draw enough current to trip this device
> > before they themselves were destroyed. This would protect the
> > attached loads, and could well leave the line circuit breaker
> > untripped. In this case, with the load being removed, the line
> > voltage would be close to 220 V, even with a small load on the
> > other side of the circuit, since the voltmeter draws very little
> > current.
> >
> > The ground wire has nothing to do with what happens with an open
> > neutral. It's only purpose is for safety. It is connected to the
> > neutral(s) only at the service entry point. If the neutral
> > becomes open, the return path for the circuit is through the load
> > on the other side of the 120/240 V circuit to the other "hot"
> > wire, with 240 V between the two "hot" wires.
You need to learn how circuits are wired. An open neutral can put two
120 V outlets in series on a 240 V supply. The ground wire has nothing
to do with the outlets power. It is not even connected to the neutral
except at a single point at the power entrance. It remains connected only
to the case, and does not normally carry any current.
Some MOV surge protectors do have MOVs between the "hot" wire and ground.
The conductance of this MOV before it failed could contribute to the
abnormal current which opened the protective breaker. In this sense,
the "surge protector" did indeed protect the computer!
Virg Wall, P.E. CA E5107
--
Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke's Third Law<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ --> >> Stay informed about: power supply |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | power supply, or ...? - A borrowed machine was being placed in a new environment for the first time. The power cable was not fully seated into the power supply on the back of the machine, and when power was supplied, there was a flash and a pop. Power was removed from that..
power-supply fan - hello, is there any experience available regarding reducing the voltage for the cooling fan of the power-supply ? I have a HP Compaq Evo d330m and the fan of the power-supply is rather noise. if I could place a resistance in the power lead of the fan,..
Best power supply? - I was looking at a few from Thermaltake, and OCZ. Im looking for at least 500W and a 2 fan supply to drag heat from my processor. Thanks.
Power supply fan - My fan on my power supply seems to have slowed down and the pc is getting hotter than it should. How easy is it to test or replace the fan ?
Power Supply - DOA? - I'm putting an Asus P4P800-SE motherboard in an Antec SLK2650-BQE that has an Antec SP-350 SmartPower power supply. When I turned on the machine, the power supply fan doesn't come on. I get screen display, and make it into the BIOS setup and then the.. |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|