"kony" wrote:
> "Timothy Daniels" wrote:
>
>>"kornball" tries diversion with ATX and cooling:
>>
>> Nice try, kornball. ATX is a "problem" if you're
>> unwilling to modify it to evolve with the electronics,
>> just as cooling can be a problem if you strive to
>> make the air flow laminar. But all your off-topic
>> references are just evidence that your arguments
>> about surge protection are still completely lame.
>>
>
>
> So you're now admitting again
"again"? "admitting again"? How many times per week
do you beat your wife?
> that you can't get an ATX system to run properly,
"can't get an ATX system to run"? How many times per week
did you say you beat your wife?
> and apparently blocking a large % of the air passageways
> in an attempt to cause turbulence.
"blocking a large % of the air passageways"? Two, three,
or was it four times per week that you said you beat your wife?
> What does 1 + 1 equal?
10 in binary.
> Would you speculate for us (if it's not too much of a
> bother, I wouldn't want to imposition you in your fragile
> state) whether you might be inclined to deny it again in a
> few days and insist on another link?
>
> This is hilarious.
What is hilarious is that the thread is about surge protectors
and you're resorting to changing the subject and making false
assumptions to "win" your lame argument.
*TimDaniels*
>> Stay informed about: recommend a good surge protector?