Welcome to HardwareForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

new system

 
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Home Built RSS
Next:  Setting up motherboard on tray  
Author Message
byru

External


Since: Oct 01, 2004
Posts: 19



(Msg. 1) Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 7:35 pm
Post subject: new system
Archived from groups: alt>comp>hardware>pc-homebuilt (more info?)

Hi,
I am planning to build up a new work(game)station.
Actually my compy looks like this:
Abit BD7II-RAID mobo, P4 Willamate 1.7Ghz (no HT), 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM
(266MHz, Kingston) and Gainward GeForce 3 Ti 200 64 MB

I think that tkats it, its time has come. Doom III and FarCry and
forthcomming titles show this clearly.

I was thinking about:
Abit IC7 or IC7-G or IC7-MAX3 (i think the original IC7 will do), P4 3.2 or
3.4 GHz (800MHz) Prescott or Northwood?, 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM (266MHz,
Kingston, yes this i wanted to save. Is it a good idea? Will they work in
Dual Channel Mode on the new MoBo?), and GeForce 6600 GT (AGP version when
available).

Will it be a good work(GAME)station for next years?

RAM related question: what about my old RAM sticks, will they do? I dont
want to upgrate them, RAM is expensive as hell and this 1GB is quite
sufficient.

What do you think? Thanks for any comments, ideas, corrections.
Best regards
Byru

 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dave C.

External


Since: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 465



(Msg. 2) Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 7:35 pm
Post subject: Re: new system [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"byru" <mbyrczek.TakeThisOut@pf.pl> wrote in message
news:2s589kF1cue61U1@uni-berlin.de...
 > Hi,
 > I am planning to build up a new work(game)station.
 > Actually my compy looks like this:
 > Abit BD7II-RAID mobo, P4 Willamate 1.7Ghz (no HT), 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM
 > (266MHz, Kingston) and Gainward GeForce 3 Ti 200 64 MB
 >
 > I think that tkats it, its time has come. Doom III and FarCry and
 > forthcomming titles show this clearly.
 >
 > I was thinking about:
 > Abit IC7 or IC7-G or IC7-MAX3 (i think the original IC7 will do), P4 3.2
 > or
 > 3.4 GHz (800MHz) Prescott or Northwood?, 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM (266MHz,
 > Kingston, yes this i wanted to save. Is it a good idea? Will they work in
 > Dual Channel Mode on the new MoBo?), and GeForce 6600 GT (AGP version when
 > available).
 >
 > Will it be a good work(GAME)station for next years?
 >
 > RAM related question: what about my old RAM sticks, will they do? I dont
 > want to upgrate them, RAM is expensive as hell and this 1GB is quite
 > sufficient.
 >

You need to change your plan slightly. If you want to use your current RAM,
you need a 533MHz FSB processor. This would be the solution if you want to
save money, as the 533MHz FSB processor would cost no more (less, maybe)
than the 800FSB version. This is because the Intel chipsets can't run
800FSB CPU with 266MHz RAM. Or if they can, I haven't seen a motherboard
manufacturer who has enabled that function. If you read the general
specifications of SOME motherboards, they will state 800FSB and support for
DDR400/333/266 (PC2100). However, what is mentioned only in the owner's
manual is that 800FSB CPU requires DDR400 or DDR333. And, even DDR333 is
not run at full speed with a 800FSB CPU. 533FSB for the CPU would not be
much of a compromise, especially if you got a processor with 1024MB of
CACHE. It would make for a very respectable gamer, and you could use your
DDR266.

For DDR266 RAM, you can use a 400FSB processor or 533FSB processor, but not
800FSB.

Now there is another solution. Abit makes a VT7, which is a Via PT880
chipset board. For that, you could use a *Northwood* core 800FSB P4
processor and DDR266 RAM. I say Northwood core, as I have read of stability
problems with Prescott processors on PT880 boards.

The correct solution however would be to replace the 1GB of RAM you
currently have with 512MB of high-quality, low latency DDR400. If your
motherboard supports dual channel, make that 2 sticks of 256MB. I think you
will actually notice a speed increase this way, even though you cut your
total RAM in half. 1GB of RAM is not significantly faster than 512MB, but
low latency DDR400 will be significantly faster than DDR266 RAM. You can
always sell your current RAM on ebay to recover part of the cost of new RAM.
512MB of DDR400 RAM with 800FSB processor would be the no-compromise
solution. -Dave<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->

 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
JK

External


Since: Aug 30, 2004
Posts: 336



(Msg. 3) Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 8:15 pm
Post subject: Re: new system [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

byru wrote:

 > Hi,
 > I am planning to build up a new work(game)station.
 > Actually my compy looks like this:
 > Abit BD7II-RAID mobo, P4 Willamate 1.7Ghz (no HT), 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM
 > (266MHz, Kingston) and Gainward GeForce 3 Ti 200 64 MB
 >
 > I think that tkats it, its time has come. Doom III

For great Doom 3 play, you should get an Athlon 64.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7</a>

The Athlon 64 chips are also great for business applications.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</a>



 > and FarCry and
 > forthcomming titles show this clearly.
 >
 > I was thinking about:
 > Abit IC7 or IC7-G or IC7-MAX3 (i think the original IC7 will do), P4 3.2 or
 > 3.4 GHz (800MHz) Prescott or Northwood?, 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM (266MHz,
 > Kingston, yes this i wanted to save. Is it a good idea? Will they work in
 > Dual Channel Mode on the new MoBo?), and GeForce 6600 GT (AGP version when
 > available).
 >
 > Will it be a good work(GAME)station for next years?
 >
 > RAM related question: what about my old RAM sticks, will they do? I dont
 > want to upgrate them, RAM is expensive as hell and this 1GB is quite
 > sufficient.
 >
 > What do you think? Thanks for any comments, ideas, corrections.
 > Best regards
 > Byru<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
Dave C.

External


Since: Oct 05, 2004
Posts: 465



(Msg. 4) Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 8:30 pm
Post subject: Re: new system [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"JK" <JK9821.TakeThisOut@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:415DC8EB.44D1C7E0@netscape.net...
 >
 >
 > byru wrote:
 >
  >> Hi,
  >> I am planning to build up a new work(game)station.
  >> Actually my compy looks like this:
  >> Abit BD7II-RAID mobo, P4 Willamate 1.7Ghz (no HT), 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM
  >> (266MHz, Kingston) and Gainward GeForce 3 Ti 200 64 MB
  >>
  >> I think that tkats it, its time has come. Doom III
 >
 > For great Doom 3 play, you should get an Athlon 64.
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7</font" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7</font</a>>
 >
 > The Athlon 64 chips are also great for business applications.
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</font" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</font</a>>
 >
 >
 >


According to <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.pricewatch.com," target="_blank">www.pricewatch.com,</a> same price range at the moment would be:

P4 3.2 Prescott vs. Athlon64 3200+ or

P4 3.4 Prescott vs. Athlon64 3400+

Beyond that range, you can pay up to several hundred dollars for either an
Intel or AMD chip, but hardly anybody gives a damn about those chips, as
hardly anybody spends as much on a processor as they do on the entire rest
of their system combined.

So the P4 3.2/3.4 and Athlon64 3200/3400 would be the best indicators of who
has the best bang for buck, at the moment.

Gaming: OpenGL: The Intel chips are much faster
Gaming: DX8: The AMD chips are faster, no doubt about it
Gaming: DX9: It's virtually a tie, as the AMD chips are two to three
TENTHS of a percentage point faster than Intel.
So on the gaming benchmarks, that's one win for Intel, one win for AMD and
one tie.
GAMING OVERALL: TIED

Business Applications: Office Applications: Intel blows AMD away
Business Applications: Internet Content Creation: Intel blows AMD away
Business Applications: Overall: Intel blows AMD away

Video Encoding: This one is so lopsided, AMD should have thrown in the
towel before entering the ring. Intel wins by a landslide.

Audio Encoding: Again, Intel wins by a landslide

Synthetic Benchmarks: (PC Mark 2004): Here, Intel blows AMD away on both
*CPU* and memory benchmarks

Even at the same price for CPU, an Intel system can be cheaper to
build, as the P4 boards are more mature at this point, and thus there are
better bargains to be found. Considering that an Intel system will likely
be cheaper to build and WILL perform better on all benchmarks except DX8,
it's kind of a no-brainer as to which chip to build with, at the moment.

Intel is better than AMD, at the moment. The only way AMD could change that
would be to drop their prices by 30% or better.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040322/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040322/index.html</a>

The following is an article on the Athlon 64 2800+. But more interesting
is,
the benchmarks included in the article are a GREAT comparison of the 3.2GHz
P4
processors with the Athlon64 3200+. In this article, these two processors
are
pretty evenly matched, with Intel being faster on some benchmarks, and AMD
being faster on others.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2038&p=1" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2038&p=1</a>

Now lets look at what Sharky Extreme has to report in their article about
the
3.4GHz Prescott processor. This one has benchmarks that are a great
comparison
of the 3.4GHz Intel chips with the Athlon64 3400+. Here, you have to be
careful,
as Sharky doesn't organize their charts in order of fastest to slowest. And
on
some charts, LOWER scores are better. But if you read all the benchmarks,
you
will again notice that the two chips are pretty evenly matched, with AMD
faster
on some and Intel faster on others.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article.php/3261_3329681__1" target="_blank">http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article.php/3261_3329681__1</a>

-Dave 9/20/04<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
JK

External


Since: Aug 30, 2004
Posts: 336



(Msg. 5) Posted: Fri Oct 01, 2004 9:13 pm
Post subject: Re: new system [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Dave C." wrote:

 > "JK" <JK9821.RemoveThis@netscape.net> wrote in message
 > news:415DC8EB.44D1C7E0@netscape.net...
  > >
  > >
  > > byru wrote:
  > >
   > >> Hi,
   > >> I am planning to build up a new work(game)station.
   > >> Actually my compy looks like this:
   > >> Abit BD7II-RAID mobo, P4 Willamate 1.7Ghz (no HT), 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM
   > >> (266MHz, Kingston) and Gainward GeForce 3 Ti 200 64 MB
   > >>
   > >> I think that tkats it, its time has come. Doom III
  > >
  > > For great Doom 3 play, you should get an Athlon 64.
  > >
<font color=green>  > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7</font" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7</font</a>>
  > >
  > > The Athlon 64 chips are also great for business applications.
  > >
<font color=green>  > > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</font" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</font</a>>
  > >
  > >
  > >
 >
 > According to <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.pricewatch.com," target="_blank">www.pricewatch.com,</a> same price range at the moment would be:
 >
 > P4 3.2 Prescott vs. Athlon64 3200+

 > or
 >
 > P4 3.4 Prescott vs. Athlon64 3400+

The Athlon 64 3500+ is very close in price to the Prescott 3.4 ghz.



 >
 >
 > Beyond that range, you can pay up to several hundred dollars for either an
 > Intel or AMD chip, but hardly anybody gives a damn about those chips, as
 > hardly anybody spends as much on a processor as they do on the entire rest
 > of their system combined.
 >
 > So the P4 3.2/3.4 and Athlon64 3200/3400 would be the best indicators of who
 > has the best bang for buck, at the moment.
 >
 > Gaming: OpenGL: The Intel chips are much faster

Wrong!!!

The Athlon 64 is much faster in Open GL.


<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=10" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=10</a>

 >
 > Gaming: DX8: The AMD chips are faster, no doubt about it
 > Gaming: DX9: It's virtually a tie, as the AMD chips are two to three
 > TENTHS of a percentage point faster than Intel.
 > So on the gaming benchmarks, that's one win for Intel, one win for AMD and
 > one tie.

Wrong. Two wins for AMD and one tie. I'll be generous though, and
call DX8 tie, so that would be one AMD win and two ties.

 >
 > GAMING OVERALL: TIED

Not quite. AMD won.

 >
 >
 > Business Applications: Office Applications: Intel blows AMD away

LOL! Very funny. Even An Athlon XP3000+ beats a
Pentium 4 3.2 ghz running business applications.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</a>



 >
 > Business Applications: Internet Content Creation: Intel blows AMD away

LOL! The Athlon 64 is way ahead in Content Creation Winstone 2004.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</a>

 >
 > Business Applications: Overall: Intel blows AMD away

LOL! Not quite. See above.

 >
 >
 > Video Encoding: This one is so lopsided, AMD should have thrown in the
 > towel before entering the ring. Intel wins by a landslide.

Perhaps with some 32 bit software, however the results may be quite different
with 64 bit software.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2163&p=1" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/linux/showdoc.aspx?i=2163&p=1</a>



 >
 >
 > Audio Encoding: Again, Intel wins by a landslide

Care to provide a link to support your claim?

 >
 >
 > Synthetic Benchmarks: (PC Mark 2004): Here, Intel blows AMD away on both
 > *CPU* and memory benchmarks



 >
 >
 > Even at the same price for CPU, an Intel system can be cheaper to
 > build, as the P4 boards are more mature at this point, and thus there are
 > better bargains to be found.

The price differences aren't that great. Keep in mind that an Athlon 64 3000+
socket 754 is only around $150, while the Pentium 4 3 ghz Prescott is
around $175. The Athlon 64 3200+ s754, is around $190, while the 3.2ghz
Prescott is around $215. The 3.4 ghz Prescott and the Athlon 64 3500+
are both around $300.

 > Considering that an Intel system will likely
 > be cheaper to build and WILL perform better on all benchmarks except DX8,
 > it's kind of a no-brainer as to which chip to build with, at the moment.
 >
 > Intel is better than AMD, at the moment.

Not quite.

 > The only way AMD could change that
 > would be to drop their prices by 30% or better.

LOL! You have that backwards. Intel would need to cut its prices
by more much more than 30% to be competitive with AMD for
many applications. A $95 Athlon XP3000+ outperforms a
$215 P4 3.2 ghz Prescott in Business Winstone 2004.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2065&p=6</a>


A $150 Athlon 64 3000+ beats an $815 Pentium 4 3.2 ghz EE
in Doom 3.

<a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2149&p=7</a>

 >
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040322/index.html</font" target="_blank">http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040322/index.html</font</a>>
 >
 > The following is an article on the Athlon 64 2800+. But more interesting
 > is,
 > the benchmarks included in the article are a GREAT comparison of the 3.2GHz
 > P4
 > processors with the Athlon64 3200+. In this article, these two processors
 > are
 > pretty evenly matched, with Intel being faster on some benchmarks, and AMD
 > being faster on others.
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2038&p=1</font" target="_blank">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2038&p=1</font</a>>
 >
 > Now lets look at what Sharky Extreme has to report in their article about
 > the
 > 3.4GHz Prescott processor. This one has benchmarks that are a great
 > comparison
 > of the 3.4GHz Intel chips with the Athlon64 3400+. Here, you have to be
 > careful,
 > as Sharky doesn't organize their charts in order of fastest to slowest. And
 > on
 > some charts, LOWER scores are better. But if you read all the benchmarks,
 > you
 > will again notice that the two chips are pretty evenly matched, with AMD
 > faster
 > on some and Intel faster on others.
 >
<font color=purple> > <a style='text-decoration: underline;' href="http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article.php/3261_3329681__1</font" target="_blank">http://www.sharkyextreme.com/hardware/cpu/article.php/3261_3329681__1</font</a>>
 >
 > -Dave 9/20/04<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
DaveW

External


Since: Mar 06, 2004
Posts: 1371



(Msg. 6) Posted: Sat Oct 02, 2004 2:25 am
Post subject: Re: new system [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

The slow RAM is going to DRAMATICALLY cut the speed of your otherwise very
fast system. Why would you invest in everything else fast, and skimp on the
very important RAM???

--
DaveW



"byru" <mbyrczek RemoveThis @pf.pl> wrote in message
news:2s589kF1cue61U1@uni-berlin.de...
 > Hi,
 > I am planning to build up a new work(game)station.
 > Actually my compy looks like this:
 > Abit BD7II-RAID mobo, P4 Willamate 1.7Ghz (no HT), 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM
 > (266MHz, Kingston) and Gainward GeForce 3 Ti 200 64 MB
 >
 > I think that tkats it, its time has come. Doom III and FarCry and
 > forthcomming titles show this clearly.
 >
 > I was thinking about:
 > Abit IC7 or IC7-G or IC7-MAX3 (i think the original IC7 will do), P4 3.2
 > or
 > 3.4 GHz (800MHz) Prescott or Northwood?, 1024 MB PC2100 DDR RAM (266MHz,
 > Kingston, yes this i wanted to save. Is it a good idea? Will they work in
 > Dual Channel Mode on the new MoBo?), and GeForce 6600 GT (AGP version when
 > available).
 >
 > Will it be a good work(GAME)station for next years?
 >
 > RAM related question: what about my old RAM sticks, will they do? I dont
 > want to upgrate them, RAM is expensive as hell and this 1GB is quite
 > sufficient.
 >
 > What do you think? Thanks for any comments, ideas, corrections.
 > Best regards
 > Byru
 >
 >
 >
 >
 ><!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
byru

External


Since: Oct 01, 2004
Posts: 19



(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2004 5:29 pm
Post subject: Re: new system [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Will upgrading just a graphic card and leaving the rest as it is do the job?
will doom3 and other new games be playable in 1024x768 high details on
GeForce 6600 GT + the rest of my current config? I dont want to play in
higher resolutions. Thats it. 1024 is a right res for me. I wouldnt mind AA
and stuff like that. Will it be fine?

Byru
 >> Stay informed about: new system 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
Related Topics:
Is this system OK? - Hello everyone, I want to build my first system and would to know if you think I made any bad choices. Gaming is not that important, mostly racing sims and a few FPS, but I would like to convert divx files to SVCD or VCD. No overclocking. I got the..

Ho much would you ask for this system? - Pentium 4 2.8Ghx 800Mhz FSB 512Mb PC2700 RAM 80GB HDD 52x24x52 CDRW 16x DVD ROM RADEON 9200 128MB GRAPHICS Built on sound 5.1 Surround speakers Windows XP with COA All in a black tower. All Brand New, powered up to test etc Would £350 be a good price t...

New System - Want Feedback - I am getting ready to buy a new system and this is what I have picked out, any feedback on it and possible alterations would be appreciated: Case: Antec Performance 1 P-160 with window PSU: Antec True Blue 480 CPU: AMD Athlon64 FX-51 Motherboard: ASUS..

new system build AMD 64 - I want to build a new system I would like your opine on this system some parts I am going to use some stuff belong to my old system your opine on all of these parts. Or alternative parts cheaper ones please. New parts 1 x AMD Athlon 3200 64bit..

New system questions - I am about to build myself a new system to replace my ageing P41.7GHZ Asus P4T. I am trying to decide between the Asus P4C800-E or the Abit IC7 MAX 3. I have heard good and bad things about both boards. I do want the new 875 chip set. I am also trying....
   Hardware Problem Solving Community! (Home) -> Home Built All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]