On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:23:29 -0400, George Macdonald
<fammacd=!SPAM^nothanks@tellurian.com> wrote:
>
>On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:55:55 -0400, "Yousuf Khan" <bbbl67.TakeThisOut@ezrs.com> wrote:
>
>>http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id%3B311116776%3Bfp%3B2%3Bfpid%3B1
>>
>
>Hmm, this initial effort looks more like a MCM compared with what Intel &
>AMD are doing. I wonder how that -- a twin core -- will sit with M$'s dual
>core processor policy?
My understanding of the MS' licensing policy is 1 socket = 1 CPU
license, so this MCM would still just be single "chip". Of course,
I'm sure that Microsoft's actual policy will end up being ~100 pages
long, impossible to read without an entire team of lawyers and still
subject to change on a whim, so I don't know that it will matter much.
-------------
Tony Hill
hilla <underscore> 20 <at> yahoo <dot> ca<!-- ~MESSAGE_AFTER~ -->
>> Stay informed about: VIA twin-core processor