Yeah, plus you would be overloading the battery with a fast discharge
and other things. I mean going from a weirdo 6.3 amp hour battery (like
in my UPS) to a 5 amp hour battery (closest available with same size,
terminals, terminal locations) is OK. I don't know the amp hour ratings
of the battery in question the closest APC I could reference (I have one
with bad batteries) is the APC BackUPS 200 which has two 6 volt 4 amp
hour (rechargeable lantern) batteries in series or some models have a 7
amp hour battery. That 7 amp hour battery is larger than the 6.3 amp
hour battery in my 750 VA UPS.
Note to UPS buyers:
True Sine Wave is HYPE for computers. I switchmode power supply will be
MORE efficient on modified sine wave.
JAD wrote:
> I personally wouldn't do it, if there is wattage differences between the
> charging systems of each model then surely at the very least it would damage
> the new batteries.
>
> "c5" <cubafive.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1146066392.585736.282430@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>> Will not using the same type APC UPS battery replacement blow up in my
>> face? I.e a BF280's RBC10 when I have a BF500 and supposed to use an
>> RBC21?
>>
>> Perhaps actually causing dreadful damage is remote, and certainly APC
>> will say "don't do that," (as will most normal people), but just
>> looking at the thing makes we wonder, as they look identical, just how
>> APC's BF line of backups work.
>>
>> For example, it may be that the only different between a 280 and a 500
>> is the battery. Therefore, putting an RBC10 into a BF500 just turns the
>> thing into a BF280.
>>
>> You don't think that APC has any electronic/electrical differences
>> between the two models? And that a BF500's control circuitry will
>> overcharge or otherwise fry itself?
>>
>> I don't know, I'd like to risk getting acid burns rather than spend the
>> extra time/money/effort to get an RBC21 when I have a new RBC10.
>>
>
> >> Stay informed about: will not same type APC UPS battery replacement blow up in ..