|
Next: suggestions please
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 30, 2005 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:01 pm
Post subject: zoom vs. resolution Archived from groups: alt>comp>periphs>dcameras (more info?)
|
|
|
I want to buy a new digital camera and ask for some experts advice...
Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its resolution
is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot. Even most of the
current digital cameras have only a very limited optical zoom (3x or so).
Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will compensate for a low zoom,
i.e. will I be getting high quality images after electronical processing
(zoom in photo editing software etc.).
I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low zoom.
Would be great to hear about this camera too.
Thanks for any advice.
Thomas >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 30, 2005 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 9:01 pm
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| im noit an expert but i would get as big a zoom as you can
afford.combo dig/op work fine.i have 7x total and wish for more.10x and
up is good.i buy clearance models to get big discount.my next will have
30/50x combo zoom.
|
>> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 25, 2005 Posts: 21
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 5:58 am
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
To some extent, what you suggest is true about high resolution compensating
for a low zoom. At least with the 350 D you have the option of a larger
optical zoom lens.
--
Joe Fisher
Teacher, K-8
Marion, MT
"Thomas Frank" <thfrank DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:A72dneLFNoqL5vjeRVn-pQ@adelphia.com...
>I want to buy a new digital camera and ask for some experts advice...
>
> Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its
> resolution is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot. Even
> most of the current digital cameras have only a very limited optical zoom
> (3x or so). Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will compensate
> for a low zoom, i.e. will I be getting high quality images after
> electronical processing (zoom in photo editing software etc.).
>
> I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low
> zoom. Would be great to hear about this camera too.
>
> Thanks for any advice.
>
> Thomas
>
> >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 31, 2004 Posts: 16
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:14 pm
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thomas Frank wrote:
> I want to buy a new digital camera and ask for some experts advice...
>
> Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its
> resolution is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot. Even
> most of the current digital cameras have only a very limited optical
> zoom (3x or so). Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will
> compensate for a low zoom, i.e. will I be getting high quality images
> after electronical processing (zoom in photo editing software etc.).
>
> I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low
> zoom. Would be great to hear about this camera too.
>
> Thanks for any advice.
>
> Thomas
>
>
all other things equal, I like the results of digital zoom, effectively
cropping the image. But other things are NOT equal. In particular
a high megapixel camera with a tiny lens can't resolve the image to that
resolution anyway. There's no substitute for good glass...and lots of it.
mike
--
Wanted, Serial cable for Dell Axim X5 PDA.
Return address is VALID but some sites block emails
with links. Delete this sig when replying.
FS 500MHz Tek DSOscilloscope TDS540 Make Offer
Bunch of stuff For Sale and Wanted at the link below.
MAKE THE OBVIOUS CHANGES TO THE LINK
ht<removethis>tp://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/4710/ >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 25, 2005 Posts: 21
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 6:51 pm
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I have a Canon S2 IS, with a 12X optical zoon, image stabilization, blah,
blah, blah..
It's a *great* camera IMO (and many others, read the reviews.
--
Joe Fisher
Teacher, K-8
Marion, MT
"Thomas Frank" <thfrank.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
news:A72dneLFNoqL5vjeRVn-pQ@adelphia.com...
>I want to buy a new digital camera and ask for some experts advice...
>
> Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its
> resolution is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot. Even
> most of the current digital cameras have only a very limited optical zoom
> (3x or so). Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will compensate
> for a low zoom, i.e. will I be getting high quality images after
> electronical processing (zoom in photo editing software etc.).
>
> I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low
> zoom. Would be great to hear about this camera too.
>
> Thanks for any advice.
>
> Thomas
>
> >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 13, 2005 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 8:46 pm
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:01:57 -0500, "Thomas Frank" <thfrank RemoveThis @aol.com>
wrote:
>I want to buy a new digital camera and ask for some experts advice...
I'm not expert, just so ya know...
>Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its resolution
>is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot.
I like a decent zoom too. That said, I think most professionals will
tell you that 90% of their 'money shots' are taken within the
35mm-50mm range.
> Even most of the
>current digital cameras have only a very limited optical zoom (3x or so).
Well... most of the 'point and shoot' digitals have a 3x, but many of
the larger digital SLR-style cameras have bigger zooms. And then, of
course, there are digital SLR's.
>Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will compensate for a low zoom,
>i.e. will I be getting high quality images after electronical processing
>(zoom in photo editing software etc.).
IMHO, there's no substitute for good optical zoom.
>I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low zoom.
>Would be great to hear about this camera too.
Nice camera!! The Fuji's also have some nice optical zooms (6x, 10x).
Olympus c-7000 (which I mentioned in another post) is a relatively
small camera with a 5x zoom. And I think maybe the Panasonic Lumix
(with Leica lens) has a big zoom. Canon's newer p&s digital cameras
are coming out with 4x, and I image all the other smaller p&s will
follow. >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2004 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:55 pm
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 30, 2005 Posts: 3
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 6:58 am
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 19, 2003 Posts: 1
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 7:14 am
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Thomas Frank wrote:
> Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its resolution
> is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot. Even most of the
> current digital cameras have only a very limited optical zoom (3x or so).
> Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will compensate for a low zoom,
> i.e. will I be getting high quality images after electronical processing
> (zoom in photo editing software etc.).
>
> I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low zoom.
200/2.8 + 2x, equivalent to the tele on a 14x zoom. >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2004 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:55 am
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2004 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 11:55 am
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Imported from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Sep 07, 2005 Posts: 40
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:51 pm
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Something to remember is that the zoom lenses become more complex as the
zoom factor increases. In addition, the base (most light thru the lens "F"
Stop increases as well. This makes a high optical zoom camera (all other
factors equal) less sensitive to light than a low optical zoom camera.
"Leythos" <void DeleteThis @nowhere.lan> wrote in message
news:pRL9f.163658$lI5.160994@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...
> In article <1130858076.281411.29630 DeleteThis @g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, bj286
> @scn.org says...
> > Thomas Frank wrote:
> > > Currently, I use a video cam to take still pictures. Although its
resolution
> > > is low, I like its 10x optical zoom which I use a lot. Even most of
the
> > > current digital cameras have only a very limited optical zoom (3x or
so).
> > > Now I am wondering whether a high resolution will compensate for a low
zoom,
> > > i.e. will I be getting high quality images after electronical
processing
> > > (zoom in photo editing software etc.).
> > >
> > > I have looked at the Canon Rebel 350D which has great features but low
zoom.
> >
> > 200/2.8 + 2x, equivalent to the tele on a 14x zoom.
>
> After having used a 10x optical and many of the older 3x optical with
> higher digital zooms, I can't understand why anyone that takes a moment
> to think about it would settle for anything less than 10x optical. Since
> we can't change the lenses on most of our digital cameras, the only
> thing that keeps the image clean is the optical zoom....
>
> --
>
> spam999free DeleteThis @rrohio.com
> remove 999 in order to email me >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2004 Posts: 187
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 5:50 am
Post subject: Re: zoom vs. resolution [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In article <gpfcf.1097$Mi5.429@dukeread07>, Chuckk2nospam.RemoveThis@cox.net
says...
> Something to remember is that the zoom lenses become more complex as the
> zoom factor increases. In addition, the base (most light thru the lens "F"
> Stop increases as well. This makes a high optical zoom camera (all other
> factors equal) less sensitive to light than a low optical zoom camera.
Having a number of normal SLR camera units I am aware of that, but I'll
take the High Optical Zoom over the low Optical Zoom any day - based on
my wide subjects of shooting.
--
--
spamfree999.RemoveThis@rrohio.com
(Remove 999 to reply to me) >> Stay informed about: zoom vs. resolution |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |